|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
Oct 15th, 2003 06:59 PM | ||
Rez | i'm just waiting for the article bitching constantly and unimportantly about this site now... | |
Oct 15th, 2003 05:47 PM | ||
AChimp |
Quote:
|
|
Oct 15th, 2003 05:35 PM | ||
kellychaos | I'm almost positive that I'm responsible for the loss of at least a few market shares. I'm truly sorry. | |
Oct 15th, 2003 05:34 PM | ||
Anonymous | I, for one, believe that a page that looks like an angsty teen's geocities page gets far more traffic than this one. I don't see why you all can't just accept that. | |
Oct 15th, 2003 05:12 PM | ||
mburbank |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Oct 15th, 2003 01:03 PM | ||
Rez |
ARE YOIU STILL HERE LIKE HE COMES TO SEE HIS OWN THREAD A LOT. MADDOX GETS OFF ON ALEXA "OH! OH! SAY IT! SAY IT! I....GET...MORE....HIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITS!!!!!!11" |
|
Oct 15th, 2003 12:59 PM | ||
Protoclown | ARE YOU STILL BEING IRONIC | |
Oct 15th, 2003 12:57 PM | ||
Anonymous |
Quote:
FINALLY. Someone that uncovered the bullshit. Maddox gets so many hits that his counters died. And alexa is considered the authority on web traffic. |
|
Oct 15th, 2003 06:46 AM | ||
FS | Aside from that, I'd hate to be a dumbass, but how does this Alexa site actually measure what site gets so many hits? As far as I know, one site can only measure the hits of another by click-thru rate, so that doesn't mean shit unless it's a widely used search engine like Google. | |
Oct 15th, 2003 04:56 AM | ||
Blue | The graph that states maddox.xmission.com is ranked high is bs. If you subtact the maddox part from the url you have the reason for the hits. www.xmission.com appears to be an isp. | |
Oct 14th, 2003 11:12 PM | ||
Anonymous | Judging from the last few board registrars, I'd say we share a target audience. | |
Oct 14th, 2003 10:54 PM | ||
Cap'n Crunch |
http://traffic.alexa.com/graph?w=379...psterdance.com HEY GUYS, THIS MUST BE RIGHT. THE SAME AMOUT OF PEOPLE GO TO HAMPSTERDANCE.COM! |
|
Oct 14th, 2003 10:37 PM | ||
AChimp |
I'm ranked higher than I-Mockery because I give blowjobs to the Internet Gods. ![]() ![]() |
|
Oct 14th, 2003 10:36 PM | ||
Esuohlim |
Hey Gadzooks, if you really are me, update my site for me, would you? And put "From Gadzooks" at the end. Thanks. ![]() |
|
Oct 14th, 2003 10:13 PM | ||
Jixby Phillips |
oh ![]() |
|
Oct 14th, 2003 10:13 PM | ||
Ninjavenom | Good god damn, he's right. :O | |
Oct 14th, 2003 10:12 PM | ||
Mockery | No, it's actually the site "ranking", Jixby. In other words a site ranked 39,323 is higher than a site ranked 124,234. | |
Oct 14th, 2003 10:10 PM | ||
Jixby Phillips |
Uh, am I the only one that is actually READING those graphs? Both of those graphs say that I-mockery gets MORE trafic than Maddox & Daily Bull. |
|
Oct 14th, 2003 10:01 PM | ||
Mockery | I rest my case. | |
Oct 14th, 2003 09:49 PM | ||
AChimp |
![]() HERE IS PROOF OF ALEXA'S ACCURACY. ![]() http://traffic.alexa.com/graph?w=379...=i-mockery.com |
|
Oct 14th, 2003 09:16 PM | ||
Schimid |
I KNEW IT ![]() |
|
Oct 14th, 2003 09:12 PM | ||
GADZOOKS |
http://traffic.alexa.com/graph?w=379...om/esuohlim&u= It has to be bullshit, my site site should be like at least #6664 |
|
Oct 14th, 2003 08:48 PM | ||
Cap'n Crunch |
YOUR NOSE HAS SHIT ON IT. ![]() |
|
Oct 14th, 2003 08:35 PM | ||
payne | listen to this great man mr.mockery and shutup | |
Oct 14th, 2003 08:07 PM | ||
Mockery |
![]() |
|
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |