|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First) |
Jan 1st, 2004 04:12 PM | ||
Mockery | It had no saving grace. Nothing. Zip. Zilch. Nada. | |
Jan 1st, 2004 03:03 PM | ||
Spooky | but it had one saving grace in the form of bill mosely playing someone almost as cool as choptop | |
Jan 1st, 2004 03:16 AM | ||
Protoclown | There was nothing remotely interesting or redeeming about the film at all. It was a complete bore from start to finish, I couldn't even be bothered to learn the characters names, nor keep track of who was dead and who was alive. It was poorly written, poorly filmed, and poorly edited. You could tell the dialogue was trying so hard to be funny but it all fell flat. It was an all around piece of shit. | |
Dec 31st, 2003 11:35 PM | ||
liquidstatik |
Quote:
|
|
Dec 31st, 2003 08:41 PM | ||
sports |
You can return previously view DVD's. Signs is good.[/quote] |
|
Dec 31st, 2003 06:09 PM | ||
Protoclown |
I finally watched it. It sucked. I traded it in at Blockbuster and ended up getting "Signs". |
|
Dec 31st, 2003 02:09 PM | ||
liquidstatik | I thought the ending was pretty good. I liked how they made 'em wear bunny suits and such. | |
Dec 31st, 2003 02:06 PM | ||
Darryl | The end had these weird alien bug creatures. If those creatures were in the whole movie, it would have been better. | |
Dec 26th, 2003 04:39 AM | ||
executioneer |
that one long crane shot before the guy gets shot is pretty cool the rest of the movie si sort of like "OH W/E " -willie |
|
Dec 25th, 2003 09:02 PM | ||
UP_SHUT | I DONT UNDERSTAND U | |
Dec 25th, 2003 04:20 PM | ||
Jixby Phillips | DOOD | |
Dec 25th, 2003 04:03 PM | ||
liquidstatik |
Quote:
|
|
Dec 25th, 2003 12:37 AM | ||
UP_SHUT | I swear to god that movie was one mix of an ADHD flash/Rob Zombie Video/Porn. It sucks ass. | |
Dec 24th, 2003 09:31 PM | ||
Zbu Manowar | I heard it was in the style of old '70s horror flicks. I should still go and rent it...won't buy it, but when I get a DVD burner that's definitely in the cards. | |
Dec 24th, 2003 04:38 PM | ||
Ninjavenom | I liked it. It was not meant to be "good" bad, it was supposed to disappoint everyone, the same way all the big 80's horror flicks did. | |
Dec 24th, 2003 04:00 PM | ||
liquidstatik | I didn't find it that bad. I mean, it wasn't good or anything. And it only followed the story for about 3 minutes. But that's what he wanted the movie to be like, so he said. :o It's worth watching at least once... :/ Mine as well, since you can't take it back. | |
Dec 24th, 2003 03:22 PM | ||
Ant10708 | Its horrible. Burn your copy of it right away. | |
Dec 24th, 2003 11:24 AM | ||
Bennett | I'm sure it will be worth at least a few laughs. | |
Dec 24th, 2003 11:20 AM | ||
Protoclown |
No, it was a real gift. He'd never seen it before and he knows I like Rob Zombie. I mean, I appreciate the sentiment, and I MIGHT not find it as horrible as people have told me, but I don't expect I'm gonna like it. Ah well, nothing to do but watch it now! |
|
Dec 24th, 2003 11:12 AM | ||
Bennett | I'm assuming it was a gag gift? | |
Dec 24th, 2003 10:58 AM | ||
Protoclown |
House of 1000 Corpses A friend of mine gave it to me for Christmas. And it was a previously viewed copy so I can't return it either. NOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!! I guess I'll have to watch it now. |