|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Apr 22nd, 2004 10:34 PM | |
| Big Papa Goat | Wow, that would be eerily spot on, if it wasn't so obvious. |
| Apr 22nd, 2004 10:31 PM | |
| Stabby |
Here is another old one; a quote that I find interesting. Junior should have listened to his pops. "Extending the war into Iraq would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting in anger and other allies pulling out as well. Exceeding the U.N.'s mandate would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the U.S. could still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land." -- from "Why We Didn't Remove Saddam" by George Bush [Sr.] and Brent Scowcroft, Time Magazine, 1998 |
| Apr 22nd, 2004 09:00 PM | |
| Geggy |
HERE ARE SOME UPLIFTING THOUGHTS FOR YOU GUYS -Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us -Secret report warns of rioting and nuclear war -Britain will be 'Siberian' in less than 20 years -Threat to the world is greater than terrorism old article but worth the read... http://observer.guardian.co.uk/inter...153513,00.html |
