|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
Sep 23rd, 2004 11:33 AM | ||
Brandon |
Quote:
|
|
Sep 23rd, 2004 11:05 AM | ||
sspadowsky |
You're right about our inevitable decline, Max. And I think it may happen within my lifetime. I think that we've gotten too big to do anything but fall apart from the inside out. Barring some massive alliance of a whole bunch of countries against us, I believe that's how it'll go down. If I sound like I'm rooting for this, it's just that I find the idea intriguing. We've become so big, so powerful, and so arrogant, that we've developed the same immortality complex that, I'm sure, was the downfall of many an empire. |
|
Sep 23rd, 2004 10:31 AM | ||
Zhukov |
Snuffed. But in a good way. I don't think anyone would think that the US would go out quietly. |
|
Sep 23rd, 2004 10:11 AM | ||
mburbank |
While I plan to remain in the US (speciffically New England) unless the country truly leans toward Fascism, the appeal of a country that has never been a world power, or a country who's glory days are behind them (but not too far behind, like say Iraq) is clear. Here's a question. Surely one day (some think sooner than others) America's power on the world stage will begin to decline. Nothing lasts forever, after all. Do you think we'll accept that with relative grace (England) Go kicking and screaming (Germany, Japan) or get snuffed (Rome) . |
|
Sep 22nd, 2004 04:55 PM | ||
sspadowsky |
Plan A: Kerry wins, I stick around a while to see if and how things shape up. If the outlook is good, I stay. Plan B: Bush wins, I stick around long enough to see if Max is right, and the Bush admin undergoes a Nixon-like implosion. If the outlook is good, I stay. If not, I sell all my shit and find another country. |
|
Sep 22nd, 2004 04:48 PM | ||
KevinTheOmnivore |
Quote:
And I don't particularly care how many ballots Badnarik is on. It never amounts to much..... |
|
Sep 22nd, 2004 12:28 PM | ||
Preechr |
Quote:
|
|
Sep 22nd, 2004 12:26 PM | ||
conus | I don't really have a plan, but recent events have prompted me to renew my passport, which lapsed a couple of years ago. | |
Sep 22nd, 2004 12:25 PM | ||
Preechr |
Quote:
Sorry, but Nader is not even running for President. Yes, the Rasmussen poll I was talking about before turned out to be flawed, but I'm gonna stick to my guns on Badnarik being the ONLY anti-war ACTUAL candidate. Polls that give credence to Nader's campaign only reflect the ignorance of the voters to reality and won't be reflected in a massive number of write-in votes for the guy on Nov 2. |
|
Sep 22nd, 2004 11:55 AM | ||
Zhukov |
I know how you feel about the whole "living in a Plan B" thing Preechr, but do you have a Plan A? I haven't really got a good Plan A. |
|
Sep 22nd, 2004 11:41 AM | ||
Cosmo Electrolux |
Quote:
![]() |
|
Sep 22nd, 2004 11:37 AM | ||
mburbank |
This thread has two points. One is to taunt Naldo, as his sureness that Bush will win and unwillingness to even consider the possability of a world in which that doesn't happen reminds me of this administration to even concider a world where everything about Iraq didn't turn out as they predicted. I think the complete lack of any sort of plan B ever about anything is the deffining trate of the Rabid Noe Con, and the consequences are devestating. So I mock it in Ronnie. As you can see he has no response. But, I am also curious as to how all of us, regardless of our political bent will react if the candidate we want does not win. In that respect, this thread hs been illuminating. |
|
Sep 22nd, 2004 10:13 AM | ||
KevinTheOmnivore |
nader is anti-war, and he is polling higher than Badnarik. ![]() |
|
Sep 21st, 2004 09:54 PM | ||
Preechr |
OR VOTE BADNARIK!!! THE ONLY ANTI-WAR CANDIDATE!!! |
|
Sep 21st, 2004 09:40 PM | ||
Stabby |
Quote:
Whoever wins though is going to have to face a huge mess that may take more than a decade to fix, both overseas and at home. I think an important question is wheter you want to go with the party that dug hole (either intentionally or unknowingly is debatable) or put in new party that at least will admit that the hole is there. |
|
Sep 21st, 2004 09:37 PM | ||
Miss Modular |
Quote:
|
|
Sep 21st, 2004 09:30 PM | ||
Preechr |
I'M NOT A WHORE, DAMMIT! SHOW ME SOME RESPECT!!! |
|
Sep 21st, 2004 09:23 PM | ||
AChimp | I only have two sides, honey. You'll have to wait until tomorrow night. | |
Sep 21st, 2004 09:16 PM | ||
Preechr | Hopefully, one day, we'll get enough good, honest judges on the Supreme Court to ban awful, gay innuendo like that. Those damn Democrats are blocking any new appointments and were stuck with these damn activist judges that are too wrapped up in getting homosexual innuendo good and STARTED instead of finally getting it STOPPED... like better activist judges would surely do. | |
Sep 21st, 2004 08:41 PM | ||
AChimp |
Fine, no sex. But you can't live with me unless you spoon with me. ![]() |
|
Sep 21st, 2004 08:31 PM | ||
Cosmo Electrolux |
Quote:
![]() |
|
Sep 21st, 2004 08:16 PM | ||
ziggytrix |
MORE AMERICAN JOBS GOING OVERSEAS! ![]() |
|
Sep 21st, 2004 08:02 PM | ||
Anonymous | Yeah, my plan B is to emigrate, though what with starting a business I don't know how feasible that option is. | |
Sep 21st, 2004 07:31 PM | ||
ziggytrix | An American is smart; Americans are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it. | |
Sep 21st, 2004 07:24 PM | ||
Sethomas | I hate responding to these threads, but the MRogers guy said something that made my head hurt. Nothing about Bush's policy thwarts terrorism any more than the democrats' agenda would, and historically he's proven by his actions that terrorism is not the priority he claims it is. If the American people honestly think that engaging in one of history's most unpopular wars and pissing off the entire Arab world will STIFLE terrorism rather than throw gasoline on the fire, then the American people are fucking retarded. | |
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |