|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Jan 10th, 2005 09:45 PM | |
| GROUCHO69 | They both would have to perform behind chicken wire. |
| Jan 10th, 2005 07:20 PM | |
| Miss Modular |
Gallagher should get together with Jimmy Kimmel and headline an act in Branson, Missouri. THAT WOULD BE A LAFF RIOT! 
|
| Jan 10th, 2005 04:42 PM | |
| mburbank |
Wow, Sspad, I had totally forgotten that. Yeah, I have to say, some sort of biography of Ghallagher seems to be called for. |
| Jan 10th, 2005 04:25 PM | |
| sspadowsky |
Aaaaaaaaand, here we are..... From Just Laugh: Of course, this is only a theory, and cannot explain entirely the many mysteries of Humor. Why does one person respond well to a joke, while another is offended and another simply 'doesn’t get it?' How did Carrot Top have an initial career, let alone a comeback? Why, at 709 words, have I already become so void of ideas I resort to making fun of Carrot Top? Why is making fun of Carrot Top, while admittedly pathetic, more socially acceptable than shoving a paraplegic out of a wheelchair, two actions with so much in common? What is Gallagher, and what would it take to get him before the Tribunal at The Hague? If Ghallagher and Carrot Top were forced to fight to the death with chain saws in a mud pit, wouldn’t that be aggressive but also pretty funny at the same time? And if it was a pay-per-view event and the money went to Orphans, who could object? These are questions only heavily funded research can answer, and I hear Johns Hopkins is in some fairly hot water these days, so don’t hold your breath. |
| Jan 10th, 2005 04:25 PM | |
| pjalne | I wish I had seen anything of Gallagher's, because that's hilariously sad. |
| Jan 10th, 2005 04:22 PM | |
| sspadowsky | I remember something that Max wrote a long time ago about Gallagher and Carrot Top fighting, and it had me in tears. I'll have to go find it....... |
| Jan 10th, 2005 03:14 PM | |
| Mockery |
I read that article this morning and was trying to contain my laughter. It was both sad and hilarious. What I want to see is Gallagher and Carrot Top duke it out in a battle for supremacy over propcomedyland. But let's be realistic... Carrot Top would kick his ass. Have you seen him lately? His arms are HUGE! |
| Jan 10th, 2005 01:47 PM | |
| mburbank |
Bitter Gallagher. That is hysterical. Thank you so much! While there is a sort of industry myth that Prop comedy in and of itself sucks, I don't think that's true at all, and this is where G is missing the point. He's correct, both Leno and Letterman do prop comedy, and some opf it is just fine. The myth arose because so many prop comedians suck. I worked off and on with a guy in Boston named Mike Bent. He was a prop comedian and a magician, both things that have a tradition of being unbearable, but he was excellent. If the prop you invented is funny, and you do something funny with it, more power to you. Smashing a watermellon is not inherently unfunny. Doing it as signature so that your doting fans know to bring tarps the way Rocky Horror fans know to bring Toast and devout Catholics know to let the host melt on their tongue isn't humor it's ritual. Ritual is the exact opposite of comedy which is all about thwarting expectations. But the idea of him as a bitter genius I really like. It's like tht story about the drunken, out of work Herve Villachez shooting his television and bellowing curses. |
| Jan 10th, 2005 12:37 PM | |
| sspadowsky |
FOR MAX, IN PARTICULAR Being the huge Gallagher fan that you are, I thought you might appreciate this article...... http://www.oregonlive.com/entertainm...8897984021.xml Gallagher gets no props Bristling at being ranked 100th best stand-up, the comic tees off on others who've hit the big time Saturday, January 08, 2005 ED CONDRAN If the late comic Rodney Dangerfield could have willed his signature line, "I don't get no respect," to another comedian, it should have gone to Gallagher. Even the much-maligned prop comic Carrot Top gets, well, props. CT, at least, has been booked on Jay Leno's "The Tonight Show." Gallagher, who will perform Saturday at the Roseland Theater, has yet to receive an invitation from Leno, even though the two honed their skills at the same Southern California comedy clubs 30 years ago. This does not make Gallagher happy. He also isn't happy with David Letterman, Tom Hanks or Robin Williams -- or with the fact that he was recently named the 100th greatest stand-up comedian by Comedy Central (he thought he should be way higher on the list). Gallagher, famous for punctuating each show by smashing watermelons and other fruit, smashes some comic sacred cows: Oregonian: You've received considerable grief from critics for using props. Gallagher: In the early days, Jay Leno told me that props are the enemy of wit. Now Jay uses props on his show all the time. Dave (Letterman) has smashed things on his show and has worn a Teflon suit. (Editor's note: Actually, Letterman occasionally wears a Velcro suit.) All that has that Gallagher flair, but I'm not on their shows. It's amazing. Dave and I used to work the same club in the (San Fernando) Valley all the time. O: Why won't Jay or Dave book you for their shows, considering you started out together? G: I don't know. Johnny (Carson) hated me, and I was on his "Tonight Show." O: How was Letterman's stand-up? G: It was terrible. You see how it is every night. He does three jokes. But Dave once told me that he didn't need an act. He told me that he was going to be a talk-show host. What I never got was that he was never funny enough to be a guest, so how does he become the host? But that's America for you. America wants the mediocre. It doesn't want the heroic or the moral. O: Much of your set is spontaneous. G: That's by design. A spontaneous moment will get twice the response of a set joke. I figured out a long time ago to work spontaneously. Robin Williams does this. But Robin always has C-level jokes since he does them so spontaneously. The thing about him is that when he says something, you think, "What does that mean?" . . . Everything he says seems funny but it's not really a joke. He was well known for taking jokes because he's an actor looking for a script. The same goes for Chevy Chase and Tom Hanks. O: How was Hank's stand-up? G: It was terrible. O: But he went on to become a huge star. G: Yes, it's frustrating. He didn't go on the road (as a stand-up) and work anywhere. I went off on the road and worked. He and Michael Keaton would meet someone in the movie business and, bang, they're millionaires and living in Beverly Hills. You have (my) skill and ability and you're renting a condo. O: So Michael Keaton was a stand-up? G: He was a terrible comedian. Jim Carrey was embarrassing. He didn't know where to go with that broad, overplayed action that he has. He could really look stupid. It amazes me that these comedians have serious acting careers. What qualifies them to be serious actors? Serious actors must be irritated by this. Why does Jim Carrey get a serious part when he got famous by overacting? O: It sounds as if you would like a shot at a film career. G: Yes. You think I would have gotten a shot by now. New York and Los Angeles just don't get me. O: Where are the people who do get you? G: Green Bay, Wisconsin. I can play a 2,000-seater there and do three shows. I'll do a show in Los Angeles in front of 800 people . . . O: How did it feel when you received the news that you were the 100th best stand-up according to Comedy Central? G: It stunk. I looked at the other people and I was trying to find anyone I ever heard of. How could I be behind people I never heard of? How many of these people stayed in the business for 20 years? I made 13 one-hour shows for Showtime, which are available on videotape. I invented the one-man show on cable. O: What's it like to be an outsider after all these years in the business? G: It could be worse. I guess I'm lucky I'm not the 101st person on that list. I might not be accepted in New York and L.A., but I have my fans and they've been very good to me. |
