Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News > Yet another lawsuit against McDonalds
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Thread: Yet another lawsuit against McDonalds Reply to Thread
Title:
Message
Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Feb 11th, 2005 04:52 PM
kellychaos Fat people are the next people to be persecuted by insurance companies and employers after they get done working over the smokers.
Feb 11th, 2005 04:06 PM
AChimp Know what I love? $1.69 quarter pounders on Sunday.
Feb 11th, 2005 01:11 PM
jimbutsu
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dole
Is that really true? Its not the case in the uk. I could feed me and the missus for 3 days on fresh food with what we would spend in macdonalds in one day if we ate 3 meals there, eeeeeaaasy.
I didn't see that you were in the UK - mea culpa. I can't speak for anyplace other than the US or Japan, which are quite different in terms of grocery prices, but where I'm at now (midwestern US) it's FAR FAR cheaper to eat crap and processed food than it is to buy and eat healthy. Books have been written on this.

But yeah, McDonald's here is REAL cheap.
Feb 11th, 2005 01:09 PM
Helm I thought lots of americans were fat because they ate a lot??
Feb 11th, 2005 12:48 PM
executioneer well yeah, but he wasn't talking about mcdonalds, necessarily.
Feb 11th, 2005 12:35 PM
Dole
Quote:
I wasn't talking about McDonald's, necessarily. If you go to the grocery store and buy three meals' worth of fresh food/meat/produce, it'll cost a lot more than three days' worth of canned/prepared/processed foods.
Is that really true? Its not the case in the uk. I could feed me and the missus for 3 days on fresh food with what we would spend in macdonalds in one day if we ate 3 meals there, eeeeeaaasy.
Feb 11th, 2005 11:59 AM
Anonymous i spent $4 at mcdonals yesterday and got!

1 mcchicken
1 dbl cheeseburger (i'd hit it)
2 apple pies
1 small drink

which all came out to 1700 calories in total

which is really a bargain if you ask me

btw, they changed their 'I'd hit it' ads to something else, it starts with a g ;<
Feb 11th, 2005 11:55 AM
Geggy EAT CHEAP, DIE FAST! LOL
Feb 9th, 2005 09:01 PM
Anonymous it is possible that you are a colossal idiot?

this is far from the first time that mcdonalds has come 'under fire' for being bad for you, and the last time it happened they added 'adult happy meals' that were way less bad for you than their normal menu on account of the bad rap.
Feb 9th, 2005 07:43 PM
ArrowX Is it possible that its a marketing thing?

What better way to get your name fresh in the minds of people than to put it on the news about it being bad. Then people will go to see just HOW bad the food really is, They can make back the money they lose in a lawsuit in less than a year so in essence there probably making more money and getting publicity.
Feb 9th, 2005 06:57 PM
HickMan good plan my man my man
Feb 9th, 2005 06:51 PM
Anonymous That's why I replace all my salt with talc.

Cause it contains most of the same letters.
Feb 9th, 2005 06:26 PM
ziggytrix All of this is tangential to the REAL problem, which is not the fat, but the sodium content of the prepared filth we love to eat. A MEDIUM #2 extra value meal contains over 80% of the US recommended limit % Daily Value of sodium for a 2000 calorie diet, according to a quick check of http://mcdonalds.com.

That's my regular (with no onions please) too.

Plus I think the 2005 dietary guidelines said that they've been saying previous sodium DV limits have been too high.
Feb 9th, 2005 05:36 PM
jimbutsu I wasn't talking about McDonald's, necessarily. If you go to the grocery store and buy three meals' worth of fresh food/meat/produce, it'll cost a lot more than three days' worth of canned/prepared/processed foods.

In the absence of the money/time issue, though, I agree 100% that ours is a culture of convenience.
Feb 9th, 2005 05:26 PM
kellychaos I think that it's more the laziness factor. I can pick up a lot of fresh produce for the same price that I would pay for a McDonald's meal.

Buying a family of three a meal from McDonals is anywhere from one fifth to one third of a weekly grocery bill depending on how frugal the grocery shopper is.
Feb 9th, 2005 05:21 PM
jimbutsu It's MUCH cheaper to eat poorly, especially when you look at the time involved in preparing healthy food (because very little ready prepared food is anywhere close to good for you). The working poor are probably the main reason the obesity rates in the US are so high.
Feb 9th, 2005 04:57 PM
kellychaos Is it actually cheaper to eat carbohyrdrates, fatty and processed foods? Seems like a growing number of lower income people are getting fat.
Feb 9th, 2005 04:30 PM
jimbutsu Perhaps the people who are REALLY upset about the lawsuit that's been filed should claim that their righteous indignation over the suit has injured them in some way*, band together, and get a class action lawsuit going against the numbskulls that are trying to sue McDonalds...


* "I was so angry about those fools suing McDonalds for their poor eating habits that I couldn't concentrate at work and lost my job!" For an extra slice of irony, make it a job at a McDonalds.
Feb 9th, 2005 03:23 PM
Immortal Goat They are responsible to the extent of cooking thier food in the equivalent of pure fat, but that is it. People do not need to eat there, people are not forced to eat there, and people shouldn't eat there. Everyone knows this, and that is why people are to blame for this fiasco. McDonalds is simply making money off of people who don't care about thier health, which at this point in history, is most of America.
Feb 9th, 2005 01:02 PM
ziggytrix
Quote:
Originally Posted by Immortal Goat
Do their ads in any way shape or form make it seem like the sexiest people eat at McDonalds? I believe there is a Minimock about that. McDonalds is not in any way responsible for making this country fat.
I think that bit about their ads kinda goes against the grain of the rest of your argument. And McDonalds is in some way responsible. To say they are wholly responsible would be stupid, but saying they are completely faultless is almost as dumb.
Feb 9th, 2005 12:52 PM
the_dudefather i bet if someone tried to sue some family owned fast food place which 'made them fat' they wouldnt even be granted a case, but mcDonalds is a massive 'evil' organisation which TRICKS you into eating
Feb 8th, 2005 01:43 PM
Drev Can't we just kill people for making ridiculous lawsuits like this?

It'll teach other people not to do the same thing.
Feb 8th, 2005 09:14 AM
Helm Somebody ban marine.
Feb 8th, 2005 01:57 AM
Marine AND WHY THE HELL CANT THEY REALIZE THAT?!
Feb 7th, 2005 10:11 PM
Immortal Goat
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gommi
Fat is one of the leading causes of death in America, and considering McDonalds is a leading distributor in fatty foods, that must mean that THEY are doing something wrong. Now you could make the argument that the American public is stupid, and this does make sense as well. So both sides are doing something wrong then.
Does McDonalds force you to eat their food? No. Do they say you will be a better person for eating their food? No. Do their ads in any way shape or form make it seem like the sexiest people eat at McDonalds? I believe there is a Minimock about that. McDonalds is not in any way responsible for making this country fat. It's like sueing Stephen King because you lost sleep after reading The Shining. You decided to do it, it's your own damn fault.
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.