|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Feb 14th, 2006 03:19 PM | |||
| Emu |
Quote:
|
||
| Feb 14th, 2006 09:57 AM | |||
| mburbank | Anything having contact with your dick, inlcuding yourself, has been violated. | ||
| Feb 14th, 2006 06:06 AM | |||
| CrazyBlackDude |
Quote:
|
||
| Feb 14th, 2006 03:46 AM | |||
| Kulturkampf |
Quote:
|
||
| Feb 14th, 2006 02:46 AM | |||
| davinxtk | Who couldn't have guessed by those thighs? | ||
| Feb 13th, 2006 09:11 PM | |||
| CrazyBlackDude |
Quote:
|
||
| Feb 13th, 2006 08:06 PM | |||
| The One and Only... |
Quote:
|
||
| Feb 13th, 2006 10:15 AM | |||
| mburbank | You know what else is good? Ethnic purity. | ||
| Feb 13th, 2006 05:52 AM | |||
| Kulturkampf | It is good that you are getting an education and that you have a passion in your way of life. | ||
| Feb 13th, 2006 12:48 AM | |||
| ScruU2wice | OAO, Have you ever seen the movie Pi? | ||
| Feb 12th, 2006 08:19 PM | |||
| CrazyBlackDude |
Jack is like a three-legged dog - funny, but in a sad way. 
|
||
| Feb 12th, 2006 01:56 PM | |||
| sadie | don't pick on the poor widdle over-compensator, guys! | ||
| Feb 12th, 2006 01:17 PM | |||
| Cosmo Electrolux | with a giant ass..... | ||
| Feb 12th, 2006 01:15 PM | |||
| mburbank | Jeez, OAO. Don't you EVER get even slightly tired of being such a hoity toity doofus? | ||
| Feb 12th, 2006 12:55 PM | |||
| Miss Modular |
Re: Every economist ever is wrong. Quote:
|
||
| Feb 12th, 2006 06:27 AM | |||
| Zhukov | Same as always. | ||
| Feb 12th, 2006 02:23 AM | |||
| The One and Only... | Are you still a communist, Zhukov? How are you justifying the labor theory of value? | ||
| Feb 12th, 2006 02:20 AM | |||
| Zhukov |
Quote:
|
||
| Feb 11th, 2006 09:09 PM | |||
| CrazyBlackDude | But Jack, you told me that you wanted to be an economist! Do you enjoy being wrong?? | ||
| Feb 11th, 2006 05:35 PM | |||
| mburbank |
Wow. That's pretty smart. You know, if you'd come up with an economic system that works, we'd all be really grateful. In fact, if a smart guy with great big thighs took over everything, I bet it'd work out pretty good. You go girl, you great, big, buff Philosipher Queen. |
||
| Feb 11th, 2006 03:29 PM | |||
| KevinTheOmnivore |
Quote:
|
||
| Feb 11th, 2006 02:07 PM | |||
| Royal Tenenbaum | Someone got a new textbook! | ||
| Feb 10th, 2006 07:30 PM | |||
| kahljorn | Okay. | ||
| Feb 10th, 2006 07:14 PM | |||
| The One and Only... |
The historical/neoclassical school of thought has no means of isolating variables in the same manner that physical scientists do, thus rendering much of its exertion useless. The a priori/Austrian school of thought relies on Kantian philosophy to give their "axioms" validity (I reject Kant, remember?). All that being said, Austrian axioms can be inferred with great sucess (if you truly need to organize an argument for them, use induction with reference to an ordinal model of chance). However, the fact that I admit that economic postulates are not necessarily true causes me to have some severe breaks with Austrian reasoning. For example, Rothbard's attack on utilitarianism/consequentialism is based on the assertion that we are unable to know utility in any context outside of our mind. However, I argue that I can infer utility (from induction with reference to ordinal chance) with varying degrees of success. For example, while inferring the utility of Play-Doh for an individual might be difficult, inferring the utility of food and water in the condition of starvation is much more successful. Rothbard relies on absolutes; I rely on likelihood. That man hates to starve is not much less likely than man acts. |
||
| Feb 10th, 2006 07:00 PM | |||
| kahljorn | I guess I'll be the first who asks how you came to this conclusion. | ||
| This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. | |||
