|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Apr 30th, 2006 12:49 AM | ||
| Esuohlim |
That part after moderators is definitely something that looks like Terra's  Also my name is spelled wrong wtf |
|
| Apr 30th, 2006 12:26 AM | ||
| Seven Force |
Quote:
|
|
| Apr 28th, 2006 09:55 PM | ||
| Sethomas |
I once read an article right after the presidential debates. Some person was very convinced that Bush was making a legitimate statement when talking about "rumors on the internets", citing that the rumors came from inter-collegiate networks (one internet) and spread onto the world-wide web (a totally different internet). So, rumors abounded on both internets. Thank fucking God for those "contested neutrality" labels. |
|
| Apr 28th, 2006 09:50 PM | ||
| Esuohlim |
BAPE just got deleted.
|
|
| Apr 28th, 2006 09:33 PM | ||
| Emu |
Good. But what about Jixby Phillips??? |
|
| Apr 28th, 2006 09:31 PM | ||
| Esuohlim |
I put BAPE there at the bottom just now under its list of moderators. 
|
|
| Apr 28th, 2006 09:28 PM | ||
| Emu |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-Mockery 
|
|
| Apr 28th, 2006 08:14 PM | ||
| Girl Drink Drunk | According to wikipedia, Dave Mustaine was the 34th president of Guatemala. Anyways, I think it's absurd to call wikipedia "corrupt". Obviously there are pranksters out there making up random shit on wiki, but to a certain degree, the folks at wiki should be able to step in. | |
| Apr 28th, 2006 06:32 PM | ||
| Emu | I think every time people get pissed off about errors in Wikipedia it's over some kind of obscure article about the year two-ply toilet paper was invented and that this is evidence that all of Wikipedia is wrong and therefore every dirty liberal who uses it is wrong. | |
| Apr 28th, 2006 06:27 PM | ||
| GADZOOKS |
I would find a few examples, but I will be gone over this weekend. WELL IF THEY ARE SO BLANTANTLY THERE YOU CAN FIND ONE IN SECONDS YOU SUCK
|
|
| Apr 28th, 2006 06:20 PM | ||
| Emu | I challenge you to find any blatantly wrong information that doesn't have a "Neutrality-" or "Factuality-" "Disputed" disclaimer. | |
| Apr 28th, 2006 06:12 PM | ||
| Fathom Zero |
I would find a few examples, but I will be gone over this weekend. However, when I am back on the internet on Monday, I will scour the Wikipedia for evidence of dastardly deeds. |
|
| Apr 28th, 2006 06:08 PM | ||
| Emu | Do you have any examples? | |
| Apr 28th, 2006 06:02 PM | ||
| Fathom Zero | Yeah, but it doesn't stop the fact that what is happening to the Wiki is real. | |
| Apr 28th, 2006 05:50 PM | ||
| Emu | Did any of you happen to realize that this is a joke site? | |
| Apr 28th, 2006 04:38 PM | ||
| GADZOOKS |
WIKIPEDIA IS A GREAT EXAMPLE OF DEMOCRACY AND I WON'T LET A NAZI LIKE YOU BESMERCH MY RIGHT TO SAY GARFIELD STABBED JULIUS CEASER IN THE BACK. YOU ARE APPALLING Also, there's tools that humans can use called common sense and checking your sources to make sure their wikipedia page is correct and just. Teachers rarely let kids use encyclopedias in general on reports if that's what you are bitching about. It's fucking free. |
|
| Apr 28th, 2006 04:02 PM | ||
| Fathom Zero |
And we can't have that, now can we? And I don't care wheter or not it is free, it is a service that millions of people use all of the time and it's carelessly monitored. The vandalism that occurs because people take advantage of the system appalls me. Anywho, it's just something I found very interesting. |
|
| Apr 28th, 2006 03:56 PM | ||
| Emu | You know what we call that? Communism. | |
| Apr 28th, 2006 03:22 PM | ||
| Chojin |
So, uh, a bunch of people are upset that a company that provides a free service allows anyone to use that free service. I see. CORRUPTION. |
|
| Apr 28th, 2006 02:44 PM | ||
| MarioRPG | Fuck you guys against Wikipedia, it does my homework. | |
| Apr 28th, 2006 01:12 PM | ||
| Emu | Except that thousands of experts, teachers, scientists, material evaluators, the editors of Wikipedia themselves, and a healthy portion of critical thinkers visit nearly every article every day. | |
| Apr 28th, 2006 12:58 PM | ||
| RaNkeri | Because wikipedia allows anyone to edit the writings. This means that you can never fully trust on Wikipedia. :/ | |
| Apr 28th, 2006 12:54 PM | ||
| ScruU2wice |
Re: The Wiki-Truth. Quote:
|
|
| Apr 28th, 2006 06:13 AM | ||
| That Man | wOOt for no reason lolroflblarg. | |
| Apr 27th, 2006 11:25 PM | ||
| DaxF | Man, shut the fuck up faggot. | |
| This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. | ||
