|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Jul 20th, 2006 02:29 AM | ||
| JMHX |
Quote:
But they don't put indexes in fiction BA-ZING Kidding. |
|
| Jul 20th, 2006 12:16 AM | ||
| Preechr | Have you ever read the Bible?! Do you have any idea how hard it is to find such specific information in that damn thing?! | |
| Jul 19th, 2006 11:45 PM | ||
| Mockery |
Quote:
|
|
| Jul 19th, 2006 10:26 PM | ||
| Preechr |
I've got customers that are going or have gone to Portugal to get experimental treatments. I don't think China is the best place to be investing into Bio-tech. Brasil might be good. While I agree this is an utterly retarded place for Bush to finally draw a line, his veto does nothing to restrict private research funding or research conducted by other countries. I see nothing wrong with somebody else in the world being better or quicker than us at something... like soccer. GO OTHER PEOPLE!! As much as I love and support what the research will undoubtedly do, I suppose I also understand just how sordid the situation will quickly become once major gains start to be made. I don't like the idea of cargo containers full of Chinese and African embryos being unloaded at American ports very much. |
|
| Jul 19th, 2006 07:07 PM | ||
| ziggytrix |
While we're on the subject of capitalist ventures of dubious morality, I'd sure have liked to get in on that Rosneft IPO. 
|
|
| Jul 19th, 2006 06:36 PM | ||
| fuck.I'm_Sean |
I like this JMHX guy.  But yeah I find it sad that the bill was vetoed. Good things could come of the research. |
|
| Jul 19th, 2006 06:07 PM | ||
| JMHX |
Quote:
|
|
| Jul 19th, 2006 05:05 PM | ||
| CaptainBubba | I need to start looking for places to invest in Chinese Bio-Technology now. Anyone know how I would go about that? | |
| Jul 19th, 2006 04:22 PM | ||
| JMHX |
Quote:
|
|
| Jul 19th, 2006 04:19 PM | ||
| KevinTheOmnivore |
Where does the issue register though with the "average voter"??? Sure, it may be something a majority of people can agree with, but where is it on the priority scale? I doubt it ranks higher than the war, security, economy, or even the borders issue. |
|
| Jul 19th, 2006 04:06 PM | ||
| JMHX |
What I find so disturbing about this veto is that in six years of acting as a rubber-stamp for legislation, having not vetoed a single bill that has come across his desk, the one bill President Bush has stood up to reject is one in which Democrats and Republicans have come together in support of in both houses of Congress, and the American people support across all political, religious and ideological boundaries, nearing 75%. If Democrats were looking for a strong issue to run on that will reflect the out-of-touch state of the Washington Republicans, they've just been given mana from heaven similar to the Clinton sex scandals that brought Gingrich's Revolution to fruition in 1994. |
|
| Jul 19th, 2006 03:44 PM | ||
| mburbank | He had to veto it, since it had nothing to do with him. If the bill had been about what he was allowed to do, he could have signed it and then issued a signing statement saying he wasn't going to abide by it. | |
| Jul 19th, 2006 03:38 PM | ||
| Mockery |
Bush vetoes stem cell bill http://msnbc.msn.com/id/13934199/?GT1=8307 I hear he also took a piss on Christopher Reeve's grave afterward to celebrate his first veto. |
|
