|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Aug 6th, 2006 01:49 PM | |
| Fathom Zero | That's exactly what they do. They recieve a small sample that exhibits the games most unsavoury qualities. |
| Aug 6th, 2006 12:56 PM | |
| Grislygus | I was told that they recieve footage of the game's most violent/explicit moments, and give the rating based on that. |
| Aug 6th, 2006 05:30 AM | |
| the_dudefather | i just assumed they looked at the source material, like textures or something, as well as playing it -a bit-. |
| Aug 6th, 2006 04:30 AM | |
| Fathom Zero |
Can ESRB Handle The Truth? Can ESRB Handle the Truth? I found this story funny. It begs the question, "How much content would be enough content to properly rate a game?". If the ESRB has to play the whole game, end to end, and unlock everything, have every secret code, and/or explore the innards of the code, how long will such a thing take? It's not like they're the MPAA and take but 90 minutes and a little time after to formulate their decision after watching a movie. |
