|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Dec 1st, 2006 06:42 PM | |||||
| Preechr |
Quote:
I think the ad could also be meant to portray him as a playboy. That's a hell of a lot worse a thing to be in Tennessee than a black guy that gets fawned over by white chicks. The South is not near as provincial (maybe "plantational?") as you Yankees think it is. Racism is far more institutionalized and dangerous up East than it is down here. If they wanted a racist ad that would have done damage in the sticks, they could have just as easily had a bunch of inner-city street-thugs giving him a shout-out, bouncing on their 22s and hoisting their forties in salute to their brother while grinning through their gold-plated grilles. Do you people REALLY think there are THAT many hicks in the state of Tennessee that voted against Harold Ford for fear of their daughters? Who the fuck's being racist here? |
||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 03:37 PM | |||||
| Abcdxxxx | I'm not sure America is ready to elect a man with Hussein as his middle name. | ||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 01:42 PM | |||||
| mburbank |
I think the racism in the "Call me" add stems from intent. I don't think a white woman coming on to a black man is inherently racist. I think the ads designers had only ne intent, though, and that is to play on fears of misegenation. If that's the right word. I could be wrong, maybe they meant the ad to have some completely different impact. I think I'm right, though. |
||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 01:33 PM | |||||
| Preechr |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Since our last discussion it seems you have put a bit more thought into why smart parties rarely run congressmen or Senators. tell me what else you've learned... |
||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 12:50 PM | |||||
| mburbank | I assume you are saying that Obama would be an AWESOME president. | ||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 12:50 PM | |||||
| KevinTheOmnivore |
Preechr, maybe you should ask a black man about the inference behind having a blonde, white, and btw seemingly unclothed (thanks to the camera angle) woman in that spot? Why did they keep running it in the western end of the state? Do the folks in Memphis not care about Ford going to a Super Bowl party (something a LOT of members of Congress do). Obama is a gimmick? Aren't you the guy holding out for just about any Republican governor to run for president?? Oh, I forgot. You have "no dog in this fight," or something. |
||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 12:41 PM | |||||
| Preechr |
Barack Obama is no more qualified to be Chief EXECUTIVE than is Max Burbank. He's a gimmick. Would you hire him to run the place where you work just because he's an effective speaker? Just because doing so would prove your color-blindness? Obama either proves that the Democrats are out of touch beyond recovery or that there truly is nobody left in that party that is qualified to seek high office. |
||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 12:37 PM | |||||
| Preechr |
Speaking of different discussions... Can you please explain to me how that ad was racist? Well, you said "racial..." I'd still question that. I wonder how many extra voters turned up just at the inference that Ford might be into white chicks. The casual if not downright reckless ways in which we invoke and provoke the racial tension pandemic in this country is the root cause of why America's not yet ready for a Black President. So soon after Kramer's flip out and the Police messes in NY and Atlanta, I'm just about fed up with hearing about race issues altogether. Racism won't be behind us until it's no longer the first thing to pop into a black person's head whenever things don't go his or her way. I'm not sure there's anything more white folks could possibly do to make that happen. Unfortunately, all of MLKjr's work was left in the hands of those with the same "War on _____" mentality that has assured our country will forever remain picking at the scab. |
||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 10:53 AM | |||||
| KevinTheOmnivore | Yeah, but like Max said, that is sort of a different discussion. | ||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 10:50 AM | |||||
| El Blanco | I wasn't refering to his campaign. I'm talking about the job he did when was actually president. | ||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 10:37 AM | |||||
| KevinTheOmnivore |
Quote:
And i'm not sure about your bad campaign comment. It was a pretty good race for what would've been the first black senator since Reconstruction. His ground team hit their base pretty hard, and got a record number of them to vote absentee in order to A. Avoid any nonsense at the polls and B. get a count on where they were by Election Day. The Ford people thought they were in a pretty good spot, and didn't believe the last minute polls coming out. He should've campaigned harder in the western end of the state, and focused less on the 'burbs. Do you really think a black man with a similar resume and no family name in Tennessee would've done better than Ford? Once again, I don't know that this country is quite ready to elect a black president. Quote:
Let's say it....JFK! No, he didn't govern according to the hype he gets today, and people often forget just how damn close his race with Nixon was (thanks Chicago!). But that doesn't mean Obama doesn't fit the type to run well and win a national race, despite lacking a lot of experience. |
||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 10:22 AM | |||||
| mburbank |
That's a totally different debate. I think the question here is about viability. I'd like him to run if for no other reason than that he speaks well. I think oration should be a requirement for the Presidency and I think they should write their own damn speeches. America ends up having to listen to a President quite frequently for at least four years. I want a good public speaker. Just so it's clear, that's not my main requirement. It's not even the #1 priority. But it's in the mix. |
||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 10:11 AM | |||||
| El Blanco |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 09:34 AM | |||||
| mburbank | Post presidency Carter would be a better president than presidency Carter. | ||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 09:33 AM | |||||
| KevinTheOmnivore | You're just the MAN, and I mean that in the bad way. | ||||
| Dec 1st, 2006 09:27 AM | |||||
| Abcdxxxx | Really? I think people are hoping he's Kennedy meets MLK.... with a hint of Colin Powell for coloring. I think it's pretty likely they got the formula at the lab wrong , and the Carter comparison is pretty right on. Post Presidency Carter, to be exact. | ||||
| Nov 30th, 2006 11:03 PM | |||||
| Preechr | I think everybody's hoping for something more along the lines of Clinton 1.01 | ||||
| Nov 30th, 2006 09:54 PM | |||||
| Jeanette X | I think he might be Jimmy Carter 2.0. | ||||
| Nov 30th, 2006 09:44 PM | |||||
| DuFresne |
Thanks for the heads up. I had just figured Lieb was running again, like always  . Now I know otherwise.
|
||||
| Nov 30th, 2006 09:10 PM | |||||
| KevinTheOmnivore |
Lieberman? What the hell are you talking about? Obama is the most popular Democrat in the country, period. He would draw the base out without even blinking, which whould allow him to work the independents and the moderates almost his entire campaign. abc, I get your point, however that's a double-edged sword. Unfortunately it would seem the more "expereince" you get in the U.S. Senate, the more you're damning yourself. Ask John Kerry and Joe Lieberman. You can ask John McCain in a year or so. In the senate, you vote for so many damn things, so many bills with silly rifers and hidden pork, it's nearly impossible to serve in the senate and not be easily smeared. Ironically, this may be the best time for Obama to run. Politcal stars can also burn out pretty quickly. Believe it or not, there was a time when Dan Quayle was considered a bright star in the GOP. He went to the White House too soon, became a punch line, and burned out. Obama runs the same risk. We also nee to ask a more basic question-- will America elect a black president? Look at harold Ford. He ran as white as he could, and still he was racially smeared...and it worked! Another inexperienced, atractive, and well spoken senator also ran for president once, and he became a pretty popular president. It may be shallow, but we aren't beyond identity politics in this country. |
||||
| Nov 30th, 2006 05:19 PM | |||||
| DuFresne | I'm right there with Modular. He's my favorite democrat right now, though I'll admit I'm not sure exactly where he stands on everything. He just seems like the best overall person out of all the possible candidates (not too hard when yer up against Hilary and Lieberman...) If he runs, good. If not, more experience could only be good for him. | ||||
| Nov 30th, 2006 05:09 PM | |||||
| mburbank | I was of the impression that you didn't need any serious resume at all to get elected President. Or are you saying as a nation we've gotten beyond that? | ||||
| Nov 30th, 2006 05:03 PM | |||||
| Abcdxxxx | No, he must run now! If he waits any longer, people will keep figuring out what he stands for/against. Having an actual defined platform isn't going to work with him like this motivational speaker for the everyman schtick has been. | ||||
| Nov 30th, 2006 04:38 PM | |||||
| El Blanco |
Its too early. And his party isn't helping. In 2012 or 2016, maybe, if the Democrats do some serious strategizing to get themselves in order. Right now, even if he were experienced enough, he doesn't have enough support. The Dems are in too much dissaray to burn out a supposed superstar on the clusterfuck that will the be 2008 election. Our next president will be a placeholder like Bush or Gore were supposed to be. Let the Dems gain some credibility and respect back and then they can try their all-stars. |
||||
| Nov 30th, 2006 03:40 PM | |||||
| Miss Modular |
Barack Obama How do we all feel about this guy? There's been talk about him running in 2008 and a lot of people want to him to. I would really like to see him run for President someday, but I also think that 2008 is too early. While I understand striking the iron while it's hot, I also think he needs more experience. If he did run in 2008, though, I would probably vote for him. How about the rest of you? |
||||
