Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News > RONNIE GETS ANOTHER CHANCE TO CHOOSE!
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Thread: RONNIE GETS ANOTHER CHANCE TO CHOOSE! Reply to Thread
Title:
Message
Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
May 13th, 2003 09:40 AM
mburbank I can't tell you how shocked I am that Naldo didn't say if he agreed with Bush on the ban extention or the NRA.

Who's right on this one, Naldo? Bush or the NRA?

Are you honestly not able to answer?
May 12th, 2003 06:10 PM
Ronnie Raygun ""Military-type" would classify as any semi-automatic or automatic weapon I believe. That would most definitely extend to asault weapons."

It's automatic.

"Its funny that there is a direct proportion of actual usage in crime to "dangerousness" of a weapon. According to the FBI, people have a much greater chance of being killed by a knife or a blunt object than by any kind of rifle, including an "assault rifle." In Chicago, the chance is 67 times greater.*

*FBI, "Crime in the United States," (1994):18"

Thanks for the fact.

It's not liiegal to own an automatic weapon. All you have to do is get a BATF license and a 6 month ATF and FBI background check.

Personally, I don't have a use for one because I don't think it's necessary for self defense. So I would have to say that I agree with Bush.

It you really feel like you need one, you can still get one if you pass the background check.
May 9th, 2003 02:14 PM
CaptainBubba It's frustrating that the two people on this board who seem to share my opinion on gun control refuse to enter any disscusion about it. :/

I'll make this my last post in this thread so that it can resume its true purpose. Speak up Ronnie.

"Military-type" would classify as any semi-automatic or automatic weapon I believe. That would most definitely extend to asault weapons.

Its funny that there is a direct proportion of actual usage in crime to "dangerousness" of a weapon. According to the FBI, people have a much greater chance of being killed by a knife or a blunt object than by any kind of rifle, including an "assault rifle." In Chicago, the chance is 67 times greater.*

*FBI, "Crime in the United States," (1994):18
May 9th, 2003 08:12 AM
mburbank Do they define just what that is or are thy the happy-types about having come up with that phrase?

My point in posting this is to see if Ronnie is capable of choosing between Bush and the NRA.

I think he's been busy trying to find a nice hand gun border, layette and crib bumper set for the babies room.
May 8th, 2003 05:57 PM
CaptainBubba The Bureau of Justice Statistics reported in 1993 that violent criminals only carry or use a "military-type gun" in about one percent of the crimes nationwide*

*U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, "Survey of State Prison Inmates, 1991," (March 1993):18.
May 8th, 2003 05:34 PM
AChimp = =
May 8th, 2003 11:56 AM
Vibecrewangel
Guns

Vince, care to elaborate?
May 8th, 2003 11:50 AM
mburbank Hey, thanks, Ronnie.
May 8th, 2003 11:45 AM
VinceZeb Bush.
May 8th, 2003 11:43 AM
mburbank
RONNIE GETS ANOTHER CHANCE TO CHOOSE!

Bush suppports an extention of the ban on assault weapons!

The NRA is shocked becuase they vehemently oppose extending the ban!


Naldo! Who's right on this one, Bush or the NRA?! This a huge opportunity for you to show the ability to present yourself as an individual!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.