|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| Mar 7th, 2009 11:36 AM | ||
| pac-man | If by "it" you mean the bullshit. | |
| Mar 7th, 2009 03:55 AM | ||
| executioneer | hahaha i should move this thread to poli/philosophy its getting awfully deep in here | |
| Mar 6th, 2009 08:40 PM | ||
| ZeldaQueen |
Quote:
|
|
| Mar 6th, 2009 08:20 PM | ||
| Kitsa | That's the way I always looked at it. The chicken prototype mutant came first, which supplied half the genetic cocktail, then the first egg with the first chicken. | |
| Mar 6th, 2009 06:52 PM | ||
| DevilWearsPrada | Which animals mutated offspring was considered the first chicken? | |
| Mar 6th, 2009 01:09 PM | ||
| Tadao | What about the question, where was the rooster to fertilize the egg? | |
| Mar 6th, 2009 05:03 AM | ||
| Zhukov | I think the answer is that they both came at exactly the same time. | |
| Mar 5th, 2009 08:57 PM | ||
| ZeldaQueen |
Quote:
 I once read (purely for amusement) one of those Supermarket checkout tabloids, which had a section called "Ask Two Old Geezers" (in which a person writes in a letter and it's answered - duh - by two old geezers). One question was from a guy who wanted to know which came first, the chicken or the egg. The answer the geezers gave was "The chicken, because God didn't create the world to sit on an egg!" |
|
| Mar 5th, 2009 08:54 AM | ||
| Zhukov |
Quote:
|
|
| Mar 4th, 2009 05:29 PM | ||
| Tadao | Mmmm chicken and egg salad! | |
| Mar 4th, 2009 05:11 PM | ||
| executioneer | on a related note i had chicken and egg syndrome when i was in highschool but the doctor gave me some ointment and it got rid of it | |
| Mar 4th, 2009 05:09 PM | ||
| executioneer |
Quote:
|
|
| Mar 4th, 2009 12:06 PM | ||
| Kitsa | You laugh but I'm on an Indian listserv and it looks exactly like that sometimes. | |
| Mar 4th, 2009 11:41 AM | ||
| Zhukov | Just because it's a spam bot doesn't mean it's not going to contribute to the message board some time down the track :/ | |
| Mar 3rd, 2009 03:29 PM | ||
| Tadao | This is (BUL) (SHT) | |
| Mar 3rd, 2009 03:09 PM | ||
| Dr. Boogie | Man, you're supposed to just delete this crap. I don't need to know about his building materials dilemma. | |
| Mar 3rd, 2009 09:57 AM | ||
| executioneer | except its a spambot | |
| Mar 3rd, 2009 07:00 AM | ||
| Zhukov | As long as they're not constantly shity, like other users, then I don't see a reason to write Neally74 off just yet. | |
| Mar 3rd, 2009 06:37 AM | ||
| electric ninja |
WTF? What's this guy talking about? What a shity first post |
|
| Mar 3rd, 2009 05:28 AM | ||
| Babs | WELCOME TO THE FORUM!!!!11!1ONE | |
| Mar 3rd, 2009 05:22 AM | ||
| Dr. Boogie | I rate it a "W" for "wrong message board". | |
| Mar 3rd, 2009 04:55 AM | ||
| Tadao | Can someone read this for me and grade it on a scale of a-z | |
| Mar 3rd, 2009 04:34 AM | ||
| Neally74 |
Breaking the vicious circle of ‘Chicken and Egg’ syndrome For the leading builders with wide experience in executing large projects for the last about 48 years, both in India and abroad using conventional methods and materials, the outcome was always different. Under the discriminative subjective tendering and outdated contract system the worst happened. When the industrialized prefabricated newly proven building materials having Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) or the Indian Standards Institute (ISI) norms and marks were implemented the cost went up phenomenally. Under turnkey lumpsum contracts, it is now proved that the obsolete conventional methods, traditional materials in use, the discriminative tender notices and primitive contract documents drafted during the pre-independence era and that too some 200 years ago for extremely limited purposes successfully prevented the introduction of new proven multi-quality materials and fully protected the ills, evils and corruption due to subjective quality controls. They are the main roadblocks in the creation of simple mass social housing units and the eradication of slums. This inhibiting system must first be immediately scrapped. The conventional subjective and discriminative tender notices and contract documents are now not legal tenders when compared to the turnkey lump sum offers for the use of multi-quality, multi-benefit proven factory made components having BIS (ISI) norms and marks. When a new competitive development plan is in place, the SPAMBOTS DIE will be able to attract more investments in the long run. Conventional tender notice and contract system are not legal now because in that system, the clients fixes the terms, conditions and rates and signs a contract for a non-existing product on imaginary, fake and vague terms with subjective personality-oriented descriptive quality controls against existing industrial dissimilar products having BIS (ISI) norms and marks, which can be seen by the eyes, felt by hand and scientifically tested before finalization of the contract deed. |
|
