Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News > Denver gives the OK to marijuana posession
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Thread: Denver gives the OK to marijuana posession Reply to Thread
Title:
Message
Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Nov 2nd, 2005 04:44 PM
FartinMowler He works at IBM
Nov 2nd, 2005 04:40 PM
Royal Tenenbaum Stupid people do stupid shit no matter what. That's why pot gets a bad name. Smart people can smoke pot and it'll be great. But burn-out losers who smoke pot all the time are would be stupid either way fucking ruin it.
Nov 2nd, 2005 03:54 PM
FartinMowler I was at my friends house on the weekend, him and his friends were high working on his car. Starts up his car after changing the oil and it all dumps on the floor. I'm watching having a nice cold beer and say under my breath "uh, did you check to see if the seal was on the old filter?" Stomps off and looks for the old filter and it's missing the seal "why didn't you mention that earlier" and I said "I did, you don't remember?" (I didn't really) :/
Nov 2nd, 2005 03:46 PM
soundtest
Denver gives the OK to marijuana posession

Nice one:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051102/...er_marijuana_1

Quote:
DENVER - Residents of the Mile High City have voted to legalize the possession of small amounts of marijuana for adults. Authorities, though, said state possession laws will be applied instead.

ADVERTISEMENT

With 100 percent of precincts reporting early Wednesday, 54 percent, or 56,001 voters, cast ballots for the ordinance, while 46 percent, or 48,632 voters, voted against it.

Under the measure, residents over 21 years old could possess up to an ounce of marijuana.

"We educated voters about the facts that marijuana is less harmful to the user and society than alcohol," said Mason Tvert, campaign organizer for SAFER, or Safer Alternatives For Enjoyable Recreation. "To prohibit adults from making the rational, safer choice to use marijuana is bad public policy."

Bruce Mirken of the Washington, D.C.-based Marijuana Policy Project said he hoped the approval will launch a national trend toward legalizing a drug whose enforcement he said causes more problems than it cures.

Seattle, Oakland, Calif., and a few college towns already have laws making possession the lowest law enforcement priority.

The Denver proposal seemed to draw at least as much attention for supporters' campaign tactics as it did for the question of legalizing the drug.

Tvert argued that legalizing marijuana would reduce consumption of alcohol, which he said leads to higher rates of car accidents, domestic and street violence and crime.

The group criticized Mayor John Hickenlooper for opposing the proposal, noting his ownership of a popular brewpub. It also said recent violent crimes — including the shootings of four people last weekend — as a reason to legalize marijuana to steer people away from alcohol use.

Those tactics angered local officials and some voters. Opponents also said it made no sense to prevent prosecution by Denver authorities while marijuana charges are most often filed under state and federal law.

The measure would not affect the medical marijuana law voters approved in 2000. In June, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that medical marijuana laws in Colorado and nine other states would not protect licensed users from federal prosecution.

Also Tuesday, voters in the ski resort town of Telluride rejected a proposal to make possession of an ounce or less of marijuana by people 18 or older the town's lowest law enforcement priority. The measure was rejected on a vote of 308-332.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.