|FAQ||Members List||Calendar||Search||Today's Posts||Mark Forums Read|
|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|Nov 7th, 2009 12:32 AM|
she is doing a good job of being a daughter, so far. additionally we have a standing policy of "don't make me worry".
|Nov 6th, 2009 08:12 AM|
|Nov 6th, 2009 12:03 AM|
|Nov 5th, 2009 10:17 PM|
she tells me she doesnt put out.
she only breaks complex electronic devices, thus preventing me from keeping tabs on her over the intraweb
|Nov 4th, 2009 07:43 PM|
|Nov 4th, 2009 07:42 PM|
|Tadao||Does she need a computer tutor? I'd do it for free cause I know your situation.|
|Nov 4th, 2009 07:37 PM|
through a series of events that would take too long to explain my daughter has destroyed four of my computers in the last year and now i cant afford a new one for a little while.
so i have to use the computer room in the building i live in
life is hell.
|Nov 4th, 2009 07:34 PM|
|Evil Robot||Computer room? What are you posting from the 1990's?|
|Nov 4th, 2009 09:57 AM|
|george||all i know that there is a woman with kids here in the computer room and i wish she would throw the crying baby down or at least give it a good shake.|
|Nov 4th, 2009 09:50 AM|
|Dimnos||You guys have CPS in the undercarriage of the world?|
|Nov 4th, 2009 03:56 AM|
|Zhukov||Did I ever tell you guys that I once saved a young boy from being hit by a car? I scooped him up before he ran onto a busy road. The mother just yelled at him (kid was about three) and didn't even say thank you. Should have left it.|
|Nov 4th, 2009 03:00 AM|
|Fathom Zero||It's not like it has a soul yet.|
|Nov 4th, 2009 02:47 AM|
|Chojin||i don't understand what the big deal is. it's her baby and she can kill it in the street if she wants to.|
|Nov 3rd, 2009 10:50 PM|
I remember an incident in the same area last year where a pedestrian got hit by two cars in a busy intersection and nobody called 911 until 45 minutes later. They showed security camera clips of all these people walking by and the guy just laying in the right lane with cars merging left to get around him.
Friendly place that mt vermon
|Nov 3rd, 2009 10:43 PM|
yes, i understand what you are both saying, however, according to the timeline and what was described in the article, those people had plenty of time to react and they did -- just not appropriately. this wasn't something that just happened, it had been going on long enough to draw a crowd of people. so that's that.
PS- these people were not suffering from collective dissociative behavior, so 'shock' justifies nothing.
|Nov 3rd, 2009 10:13 PM|
have you ever been so stunned by something you just dont react?
i saw a guy get hit by an airplane propeller once. i just disconnected. i saw it, i knew what i saw, but was completely incapable of doing anything.
all i am getting at is that i could see how a screaming naked woman throwing down a baby would seem unreal and i would just stand there for a moment before i had any kind of reaction.
and then i would prolly laugh or something.
|Nov 3rd, 2009 08:59 PM|
|Dimnos||Don't forget the time it would take you to actually move over there to do anything about it. That would give her enough time to body slam the baby what? 2-3 times total? Sounds about what they said. Hmmm....|
|Nov 3rd, 2009 06:27 PM|
i think i know someone who might want a slightly damamged baby!!!!!
but what could any of those people have done.
lets say you're standing around playing hacki sak or some shit and this naked lady comes running out holding a baby. the ten seconds or so it takes you to even react to that is going to be all the time she needs to slam the baby down.
please, like any of us would be ninja enough to have stopped her if we even cared enough to try
|Nov 3rd, 2009 05:47 PM|
|captain516||That reminds me, when does the Secret Santa thing start?|
|Nov 3rd, 2009 05:33 PM|
|Tadao||I'm going to buy you a cape for Christmas.|
|Nov 3rd, 2009 05:28 PM|
fact: those people that were there could have helped that baby, they didn't, they watched that baby become harmed, and if it survives, it will never be okay.
i also very clearly stated that i was basing my opinions on the assumption that the article was accurate.
|Nov 3rd, 2009 03:47 PM|
Fact: It is not a crime for a woman, crazy or not naked or otherwise, to walk toward or carry her own child.
Fact: One man did intervene and quite possibly saved that babies life.
You were not there and cant possibly know all the details of the situation and are thus unqualified to pass judgment of those who were. Quite possibly all the details given in the article were attributed by multiple sources and no one fully had a grasp of the situation at the time.
|Nov 3rd, 2009 03:03 PM|
|george||maybe they wanted her to throw the baby down. i fucking hate babies.|
|Nov 3rd, 2009 02:59 PM|
|Tadao||WTF is up with all the 911 calling, cell phones take videos nowadays.|
|Nov 3rd, 2009 02:56 PM|
i based the timeline off of how it was described in the article --
a naked woman came out into the streets screaming, people noticed this, called the police, gathered around to watch, the bystanders then witnessed her assaulting her child. some of them called 911 again to report that she was harming the baby and one man did something after the baby had been hurt at least 2-3 times. that's unacceptable. man is not a hero.
edit: to add, my point isn't that they didn't act quick enough, it's that they didn't really do anything at all.
they knew the woman was crazy, they called the police, she was naked in the street screaming, common sense would tell anyone not to let the batshit woman near a child. if they saw her moving toward the child, or come back with the child in her arms, they should have stopped her right then.
|This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|