Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News > Why the left hates talk radio
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread: Why the left hates talk radio Reply to Thread
Title:
Message
Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Jun 14th, 2003 08:56 PM
Immortal Goat Don't make Vince tell his sources. First of all, it would take away the one thing in the world he has aside from his "sorta girlfriend", which would be his knowing he has knowledge that everyone else lacks. If he gives his sources, then we will all know what Vince is talking about, and then he won't think he seems so smart. Secondly, he really looks like a complete dick when he doesn't, and that is all anyone really cares about.
Jun 14th, 2003 01:48 PM
Jeanette X
Quote:
Originally Posted by VinceZeb
What do I get for showing you sources?
Crediblity. Showing your sources is one of the most fundamental rules of writing persuasively.
Jun 14th, 2003 09:06 AM
AChimp Internet amateur.

If Jamesman were here, he'd show you even better pictures.
Jun 14th, 2003 08:47 AM
VinceZeb What the hell is a Goatse photo?
Jun 13th, 2003 11:51 PM
Immortal Goat AChimp, I don't know if I should thank you for clarifying that you were NOT referring to me when you said GOATSE, or if I should continue to pound my head onto my keyboard to try to rid my memory of any and all knowledge of that photo's existence.
Jun 13th, 2003 12:52 PM
Alxcipher Did Boortz set out to write the Articles of Confederation? No, he did not. He had 700 word-limits to his columns, so he must write something that will get people to look at the page and hopefully click on an ad and buy something. It's something called BUSINESS.

So is it "business" or "the truth". You tell me idiot?

And besides, if you want to validate the arguments or disprove them, go to your local public school. I have seen the evidence myself, and he is right on target with a LOT of these "starving" children. Do you know the govt considers "starvation" when you have missed ONE meal in a week? If that were the case, most of the fucking country would be starving. Bet you didn't know that.

Firstly I wouldn't see anything similar as I'm in a completely different country. And if he is "on target" with his rather baseless assertions then why is it so hard for you to back them up? And why would it be someone else's responsibility. I think you're way to eager to believe this Boortz character and not eager enough to consider the worth of his mere "opinion".
Jun 13th, 2003 12:33 PM
mburbank Slapped around over at Newsfilter?

Or maybe looking like marginally less of an ill informed chump ready to believe any old thing that feeds his dislike of the poor?
Jun 13th, 2003 12:29 PM
VinceZeb What do I get for showing you sources?
Jun 13th, 2003 11:05 AM
kellychaos
Quote:
Originally Posted by VinceZeb
I'm not here to be your fact book. If it's so fucking important that I am wrong, go prove I am wrong.
It doesn't work like that. The burden of proof is on the initiator of the statement, otherwise it's just so much cyber-diarrhea. There have been very few threads in which you have provided a link or quote wherein your "proof" is anything other than the opinion of one of your conservative superheros. I value their opinion just slightly more than yours ... which is to say zero. Facts and figures, Vinth!
Jun 13th, 2003 10:00 AM
mburbank Didn't they teach you in chool that you can't prove a negative?

The ONLY way to prove the government never said any such thing ever would to post absolutely everything they had said.

It's your fabrication, you're the guy who's constantly sounding out your blowhole about how you can back stuff up. Put your money where your mouth is. I say you're a big fat liar OR you credulously swallowed a big fat lie you WANT to believe becuase it suits your hate filled poor me whiny spoiled attitude.

And Vinth. I'm curious. That's the very first time you edited a post becuae I pointed out you'd coommitted a stupidity. Could it be my constant encouragement and urging you to take some small measure of care in how you communicate is finally taking effect?

Vinth Historians need not worry. I copied the original line. I bet you know where to find it.
Jun 13th, 2003 09:41 AM
VinceZeb I'm not here to be your fact book. If it's so fucking important that I am wrong, go prove I am wrong.
Jun 13th, 2003 09:35 AM
AChimp STEPTH TO BEING VINTH
1. Pull random facth out of ass.
2. Refuth to back them up.
3. Inthult other perthon for knowing nothing of talking what I am about.

Quote:
wait, he didn't say Goat, did he? He said Goatse. What the hell is that?
GOATSE
Jun 13th, 2003 09:33 AM
mburbank No one can 'education' you.



What you mean is you heard that thing about starvation, immediately belived, have no idea what the source is and can't even envision how you find back up.
Jun 13th, 2003 09:23 AM
VinceZeb Annie Sullivan couldn't educate you, Max.
Jun 13th, 2003 09:18 AM
mburbank I didn't. I have no idea what you are refering to when you say our government conciders missing a meal day 'starvation'. Educate me.
Jun 13th, 2003 08:36 AM
VinceZeb Did Boortz set out to write the Articles of Confederation? No, he did not. He had 700 word-limits to his columns, so he must write something that will get people to look at the page and hopefully click on an ad and buy something. It's something called BUSINESS.

And besides, if you want to validate the arguments or disprove them, go to your local public school. I have seen the evidence myself, and he is right on target with a LOT of these "starving" children. Do you know the govt considers "starvation" when you have missed ONE meal in a week? If that were the case, most of the fucking country would be starving. Bet you didn't know that.
Jun 12th, 2003 11:51 PM
Alxcipher Vince, you think a some vague assertions that lack any evidence are the "truth"? Is ignorance really bliss, if you believe that you're dumb enough to believe anything. I personally would appreciate a higher burden for what I label as "the truth".
Jun 12th, 2003 11:44 PM
ItalianStereotype
Quote:
Originally Posted by Immortal Goat
wait, he didn't say Goat, did he? He said Goatse. What the hell is that?
one more reason why I-Mockery needs an age requirement.
Jun 12th, 2003 11:39 PM
VinceZeb Truth hurts, huh?
Jun 12th, 2003 11:36 PM
Alxcipher That article was horrid. It is just like reading the federalist fucking papers. Commentary all based on principle and over-simplification. All these "left or right" division are entirely inert for any communicable purpose.
Jun 12th, 2003 11:06 PM
Immortal Goat wait, he didn't say Goat, did he? He said Goatse. What the hell is that?
Jun 12th, 2003 11:03 PM
Protoclown That was YOU in the picture???


Jun 12th, 2003 10:44 PM
Immortal Goat You rang, AChimp?
Jun 12th, 2003 07:04 PM
AChimp It's just the Internet Naivety, Jeannette. It goes away once you have been exposed to... the Goatse.
Jun 12th, 2003 02:08 PM
Jeanette X
Quote:
Originally Posted by VinceZeb
Now Jean, I know you like to try to get into the big-people arguments, but when you are making a failed attempt to seem mature, a toilet goes unscrubbed and a steak uncooked.
Better to be young and naive than old and mentally retarded. I am the only person who remained neutral in the Great Flame War that you are losing, and actually attempted to debate you civilly, because I thought you might be somewhat intelligent underneath your blustering. I really am naive sometimes. :/
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.