|FAQ||Members List||Calendar||Search||Today's Posts||Mark Forums Read|
|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|Mar 25th, 2003 07:40 PM|
Hey, Vincey, you break out your torah and tell me if you even KNOW what language it was 'originally' written in. You read that language? No? Where's you get the translation and the interpretation? My guess? Same narrow minded place Naldo did. Oh, Oh, wait, you got it while studying for the Priesthood, no doubt.
So you read the commandment as God being okay with 'collateral damage' as long as it wasn't intentional, eh? Where do you suppose the Big G draws his line? If we accidentally kill a few innocents while waging just war, that's fine. When we drop bombs on wedding parties we get a waiver on sin, because we didn't mean to kill those folks. When we drop a bomb on an Afghani becuase he's TALL and Osama bin weforgethisname is TALL, OOPSY! Kill some Candadians or Britts in 'friendly fire' and "All in a good cause, my children, have some more GO pills!" sayeth the Lord, But my God, Clinton (whom by the way I loathe) put his pecker in someone he wasn't married to, and GOD IS REALLY MAD!!! Newsflash, chumly, what Clinton did may be demeaning and mean as hell to his wife and kid, it may disgrace the oval ofice but sooner his weiner in the wrong hole than a FUCKING DAISYCUTTER. If you really believe that's the way God's law operates and your right, then God needs to rethink his priorities. Thankfully, I'm fairly sure God doesn't like it when you kill innocent people, even if you didn't mean to. I don't think he likes it if Sadam does it, but I don't think he likes it if we do either. My guess. The whole fucking human race makes God pretty disapointed.
What's the matter, didn't Commander and Chief Clinton seem like a CRAZY motherfucker when he was, say, fucking? Do you need to kill lots of people to be the kind of CRAZY motherfucker you dig?
|Mar 25th, 2003 07:07 PM|
|Protoclown||Vince, I never said that Bush was going into Iraq merely for oil. You need to calm yourself down and realize that I was ONLY JOKING.|
|Mar 25th, 2003 04:55 PM|
I am totally not making fun of you. And I'll leave my raping to Clinton. He's a PROVEN commodity.
|Mar 25th, 2003 03:44 PM|
Anyone can 'justify' the murder of another person, even with something as silly as 'I was in the mood.'
But according to your little religion, only God can judge. Awfully presumptuous of your white knight that he has a direct channel to the will of the almighty. Oh, biscuits; isn't pride another sin?
*Laws, I forgot that the Pope and his own church told him that if he invaded Iraq, he'd go in without God. So if it isn't justified by Jay-sus...
|Mar 25th, 2003 02:33 PM|
Ok Proto, where does it say anywhere with viable proof, quotes or documentation that Bush is only doing this because he wants the oil fields? If he wanted the oil fields, why didn't he invade Kuwait? Why doesn't he say "Fuck Congress" and drill up in the barren wastelands of ANWAR? Why didn't he just make secret payments to Saddam for oil?
If you can give me some evidence of the fact that bush is doing this for ONLY for oil, I would most likely change my opinion on the causes for this war.
|Mar 25th, 2003 01:52 PM|
|Protoclown||THOU SHALT NOT COVET THY NEIGHBOR'S OIL FIELDS|
|Mar 25th, 2003 10:23 AM|
|VinceZeb||Break out a Torah and look it up in the original text the Torah was written in. Says it plain as day. If it were Thou Shalt No Kill, Id say so.|
|Mar 25th, 2003 07:09 AM|
|FS||here we go again.|
|Mar 25th, 2003 01:44 AM|
Last time I checked, Bush didnt leave his Bible in the closet after his sunday photo shoot.
And if you are trying to talk about Thou Shalt not Kill, dont try. The actual text shows it as Thou Shalt Not Murder. And in the bible, murder is the unjustified intentional slaying of another man or beast for no rhyme or reason.
|Mar 25th, 2003 01:16 AM|
|Anonymous||Our current administration is breaking a handful as we speak.|
|Mar 25th, 2003 01:05 AM|
Yes, the pun there was intended.
Juanita Broaddrick. Violated by Clinton. Others could not be proven. The ones that weren't proven have soild evidence, even without Clinton's proven track record of being a Commandment-breaker.
|Mar 25th, 2003 01:01 AM|
|Mar 24th, 2003 01:48 PM|
|Anonymous||When DIDN'T IT?|
|Mar 24th, 2003 01:45 PM|
Clinton is a proven rapist? That's news to me. Seriously.
When did this happen?
|Mar 24th, 2003 01:28 PM|
Are you making fun of me, Max?
'Cause if you're here for the raping, well, all I can say is 'get in line.'
|Mar 24th, 2003 01:21 PM|
And to calm whatever fears you seem to have, I am pretty well-spoken and tactful when it comes to political debates... that is, if I am talking to people that actually can think. I take the road of my opponet if I know to begin with there is no way he is trying to convince me that he/she is RIGHT, but is just trying to discredit the FACTS *I* display and give.
If we found out right now that this war was just a way for the U.S. to invade and become the next Great Roman Empire, and there was sufficient proof to back up that statement, I would be against Bush and the administration. I dont flip flop when it comes to who is president. I don't like Clinton because he is a proven adulter and liar and rapist. But during times of war, I supported our troops and supported the battles that were right. Iraq was right. Kosovo was genocide by the U.N. and Sloberdom. But the thing is, there isn't a big outcry for those poor muslims that got slaughtered or the christians that were as well. Because Clinton was president.
And people didn't go out and scream about it like they did now. That is why I am, if I had to describe myself, an independant conserative with libertarian leanings. Every idea that I have always believed has always went along with those groups. If there is a liberal one, I cant find it. If I had it, id admit it. BUt I dont like the left because if I had to choose who is going to fuck up the country faster, Id rather be on the freight train (Repugs) and not the bullet train (Democrats).
I do appreciate your geninue open-mindedness to views perhaps opposite of your own and that you don't resport to open mockery and slander. That is admireable.
|Mar 24th, 2003 01:07 PM|
|Jeanette X||Okay...thats relieving at least...|
|Mar 24th, 2003 01:04 PM|
Jeanette, You know what I mean. They have a lot less likely chance of that stuff happening with Saddam gone. Of course that is what we are going to do. We are going to help build up the region, from what has been told and reported.
And I did not mean this misinformation screed towards you. I cant remember who I said it to, but it it definently was not you.
|Mar 24th, 2003 12:45 PM|
|mburbank||Oh, Man! That goes on my list with "Cardigan Manditory"!|
|Mar 24th, 2003 12:40 PM|
Jesus! So that's why I'm being raped!
At least I know now.
|Mar 24th, 2003 12:36 PM|
|Mar 24th, 2003 12:31 PM|
[quote="VinceZeb"]. I may possibly run for office, quote]
Well Christ, I sure as hell hope that you treat debating opponents with more respect than I've seen here.
|Mar 24th, 2003 12:20 PM|
|mburbank||Pucker up, Officer.|
|Mar 24th, 2003 11:58 AM|
|VinceZeb||I love the fact that you can't argue a statement I made, so you just go the knuckle-dragging route of cheap insults.|
|Mar 24th, 2003 11:39 AM|
I'm not sure what all you're saying, Dreamboat, but when you talk about Molding a chair to your ass and your tan, well, lets just say there's lot of folks here you could hang a coat off right now.
And when you say "Bitching"?
You can 'pull' our 'cart' any day, officer!
CHANGE MY WORLD, VINCIE! CHANGE IT!!!
|This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|