|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First) |
Mar 30th, 2003 06:16 PM | |||||||||||
KevinTheOmnivore |
Quote:
Secondly, the connections are much more shady. Milosevich was blatantly and consistenly commiting genocide. While Saddam's regime is (was) just as rotten and oppressive, it wasn't done in the same fashion. Also, why are we going to war? To end terrorism? To liberate Iraq? To "save" the Middle East from its backward self? For oil? The objectives are much more unclear in this war, period. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Maybe they have fears of us using illegal crowd control nerve gases, like our military hinted at doing? I dunno, you tell me. Either way, we'll never know now, since the facade of a weapons inspection was shaemfully used by the Bush administration to go to war. It took 3 years for the team to be comiled. We gave them a little over three months. NO weapons inspection has gone that long and been expected to succeed. It was a hoax all along. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So should it be called "Operation Iraqi Freedom, of course, only if it's in our interest, otherwise, fuck 'em" ???? You're quite the humanitarian, Ronnie. |
||||||||||
Mar 28th, 2003 01:03 PM | |||||||||||
Protoclown |
"I'm a piss poor example of what Christianity should be" -- Ronnie Raygun Just playing the game, folks. Just playing the game. |
||||||||||
Mar 28th, 2003 10:04 AM | |||||||||||
sspadowsky |
Yes, it was, wasn't it? ________ LovelyWendie99 |
||||||||||
Mar 28th, 2003 10:02 AM | |||||||||||
Ronnie Raygun | Good come back, Spad. | ||||||||||
Mar 28th, 2003 09:33 AM | |||||||||||
sspadowsky |
Quote:
________ Mexico City Hotels |
||||||||||
Mar 28th, 2003 09:27 AM | |||||||||||
sspadowsky |
Quote:
________ Iolite vaporizer website |
||||||||||
Mar 28th, 2003 09:10 AM | |||||||||||
VinceZeb |
Yes, they broke laws that they agreed to after Gulf War I. See, that is the problem with you people that try to dismiss off my ideals. The problem is, they are right. You just dont like the messenger. Which only proves my point about you who won't directly debate the points made. Disregarding me and people like me wont make the truth not the truth anymore. |
||||||||||
Mar 28th, 2003 07:50 AM | |||||||||||
Ronnie Raygun |
"but of more importance i think is that they are executing POWs" HA! You think spad cares. He thinks it proves his point. "That's what they get for being there" - Spad |
||||||||||
Mar 27th, 2003 09:25 PM | |||||||||||
Jeanette X |
Quote:
|
||||||||||
Mar 27th, 2003 05:49 PM | |||||||||||
ItalianStereotype |
Quote:
but of more importance i think is that they are executing POWs... |
||||||||||
Mar 27th, 2003 05:34 PM | |||||||||||
kellychaos |
Quote:
Quote:
BTW, check your attitude at the door when someone's asking a sincere question. There's no need to be insulting and I know that you're more intelligent than some of these other "jerk offs" in this forum. |
||||||||||
Mar 27th, 2003 04:03 PM | |||||||||||
FS | Haha, that's an amusing quote. Are these the same evildoers the US put out there themselves? You know, sorta like target practice? | ||||||||||
Mar 27th, 2003 03:18 PM | |||||||||||
Jeanette X |
Quote:
|
||||||||||
Mar 27th, 2003 02:27 PM | |||||||||||
sspadowsky |
190 kilometers? OH MY GOD! ANOTHER 10,000 KILOMETERS, AND THEY MIGHT BE HITTING OUR SHORES! CLEARLY THEY ARE A DIRECT THREAT TO US AFTER ALL! ________ Vaporizer Review |
||||||||||
Mar 27th, 2003 02:11 PM | |||||||||||
ItalianStereotype |
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/27/spr...ted/index.html they have also fired missiles ranging 190 kilometers, a clear violation of resolutions 687 and 1441. |
||||||||||
Mar 27th, 2003 08:52 AM | |||||||||||
Ronnie Raygun |
"Your naive and ignorant if you DON'T believe people like myself have held, and maintain criticism of Clinton's foreign policies. - Kevin WHERE WERE THE PROTESTS WHEN CLINTON BOMBED CIVILAIN TARGETS IN IRAQ AND IN KOSOVO???? PLEASE ANSWER!!! "But the fact remains that this is different than Kosovo, it's different than Desert Fox, and it's even different than the FIRST Gulf War." - Kevin IT WAS NO DIFFERENT WHEN THE PROTESTS STARTED 6 MONTHS AGO!! HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THAT!!! "Your unwillingness to acknowledge this only proves how blinded you are by your desire to see this war. - Kevin It's different now because the Iraqi people are being liberated as a result of us protecting our national security. "I disagree completely, because unlike yourself, many opposing the war can think and analyze on multiple levels. It's like saying "if you buy gas, you support terrorism." As cute and amusing as that line is, it's not all that true, and far too simplistic, wouldn't you agree?" No I don't. Because it's not my analyzation that's in question. It's a questio og Saddam's interpretation. CAN YOU NOT SEE THAT? When he sees people on t.v. burning the American flag and protesting the U.S. while saying NOTHING about what he's doing wrong, it looks like support for him. It has nothing to do with ME. It's between YOU and HIM. "Like Choimp said, maybe Iraq has decided American soldiers don't "count" in terms of Geneva. - Kevin If they do, they are wrong. "Saddam's "best" troops have pulled back to Baghdad, they will do ANYTHING, I have no doubt." - Kevin Wrong, secret police thugs are in Baghdad while the best troops are in Baghdad. "They will use civilians, they will play very, VERY dirty. It will be nearly impossible I think to get them without causing a considerable amount of damage." - Kevin The civilian population will start to leave Baghdad when the fighting starts there. Therefore making it harder for these people to blend in. "1441? Cuz of the SCUDS that haven't been fired? Because of the WMD that haven't been found? Cuz of the bio-weapons and the gasses that haven't been found?" - Kevin EXACTLY!!! Blix is an idiot who couldn't find what he was looking for. Why? Well, mostly because that's not the job of the inspectors. Every nation knows he has them.....why do his troops have chemical suits and remedies for chemical and bio exposure? "You hate the UN, and you likewise could care less if we abided by their decisions. The new found love and respect for the "sanctity" of the UN and global treaties is a joke. Youuse it for your own personal advantage now." - Kevin I have no love for the U.N. You are right. When it suits our purpose, I think we should use it as a tool just like every other country does. "Why lock men up in Cuba? Why interogate men IN Pakistan?" - Kevin Why not? What difference does that make? Does Geneva not apply there? "Would we be doing this if 1. 9/11 had not happened, a 2. there were no natural resources there? - Kevin Probably not. "When does the liberation of Sudan start? How about the liberation of Qatar, our alllies? How about Pakistan? North Korea? the Kurds? China?" - Kevin When we have a security interest there. "If you are anti-war you're this, if you're pro-war your that. You should write for Sesame Street." If I did, you still wouldn't be able to comprehend it |
||||||||||
Mar 27th, 2003 08:02 AM | |||||||||||
VinceZeb |
They cant explain it. I'll just go ahead and answer it for you: No Blood for Oil is a perfect liberal mantra. 1) It fits on a bumper sticker, which is the extent of liberal evidence and brain power. 2) The question on a base level answers itself, but when you ask these protester to show evidence or proof to anything, you are nothing but a facist warmonger. Man, I could go on for days, but it wont answer the question fully at hand. |
||||||||||
Mar 26th, 2003 03:40 PM | |||||||||||
The_Rorschach | Assume I'm a complete and other shitwit, not far from the truth, and explain to me the connection between government action and Saddam's oil. As to date, I have only heard the most tenuous ties made between the two. | ||||||||||
Mar 26th, 2003 03:31 PM | |||||||||||
mburbank |
Actually, my answer was completely serious. The UN is a difficult, fractious, unwieldy tool, but it's the only tool out there. For any action to take place, ENORMOUS pressure has to be brought to bare. A good example was the invasion of Kuwait. The difference between That and Rawanda and Yugolsavia is spelled O-I-L. Just becuase you didn;t understnd me, don't assume I didn't mean something. And Shach. I repectfully disagree. I think the major differences between North Korea and Iraq are that North Korea has nuclear weapons and a capable army strategically placed and does not have oil. We can't beat the crap out of them as easily as we do Iraq, and there are no spoils to be had. |
||||||||||
Mar 26th, 2003 12:23 AM | |||||||||||
KevinTheOmnivore |
Quote:
Quote:
You said he said something, I showed he said otherwise. Nothing devious, nothing deceptive, pretty straight forward point-counter point. |
||||||||||
Mar 25th, 2003 02:17 AM | |||||||||||
VinceZeb | Max once again avoids the serious question that I propose to him about his precious U.N. Wow. | ||||||||||
Mar 24th, 2003 07:25 PM | |||||||||||
AChimp | Or, you know, they might all wanna set a few off so they can glow in the dark. | ||||||||||
Mar 24th, 2003 05:41 PM | |||||||||||
The_Rorschach |
"N. Korea is a threat, definetely has WMD, and represses its people. Why aren't we at war with them also for those reasons?" If you don't know the answer to this one, you shouldn't be an active participant in these conversations. The differences between the two are actually rather obvious. North Korea did not prosecute a war on its neighbor, regardless of whatever provocation was given. Secondly, it did not choose aggressive action against the U.N. coalition and then refuse to abide by the peace agreement that it agreed to. Thirdly, diplomacy between Kin Jung Il and the U.N. is more than a possibility, it is a reality. Talks are underway currently to discuss whether nuclear arms in Korea will be allowed, and if disallowed, what will be offered in return to mitigate factors. Unlike Iraq, which stockpiled weapons as a reality, North Korea is merely building the capabilities to create nuclear and ballistic warheads. Why, and why do so publically? It's believed by many, and I am one, that it is a facade being utilized in order to strengthen bargaining tactics which will grant North Korea with better trade options and pump their staggering economy and maybe even see to it that their citizens can eat at least once day. |
||||||||||
Mar 24th, 2003 05:14 PM | |||||||||||
Jeanette X |
Quote:
|
||||||||||
Mar 24th, 2003 04:03 PM | |||||||||||
mburbank | Nobody gives a screw about darkies and unibrowed eastern euros who don't have any oil in the first place, so it didn't seriously come up. | ||||||||||
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |