|
||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| May 2nd, 2003 12:21 AM | ||
| CastroMotorOil | They look great and have a ton of good info on them, if people read them it should help solve a lot of the problems around here. good job mr mockery. | |
| May 2nd, 2003 12:03 AM | ||
| Mockery |
The new rules & guidelines have been posted, please review them: http://www.i-mockery.net/viewtopic.php?t=3138 |
|
| Apr 29th, 2003 08:41 PM | ||
| UnDeath | eyah, but those people arent much better now, so it wont really matter. | |
| Apr 29th, 2003 08:27 PM | ||
| noob3 |
The ignore function will be dumb, people will start being babies and ignoring everyone. And people will try to use it in arguements, IE: If you have ever played BW and sat in -x17 long enough, there was nothing lamer than some snobby high-level person typing this 1 line in a chat "Ignored" Ugh :vomit |
|
| Apr 29th, 2003 08:17 PM | ||
| Jixby Phillips |
LETS TALK ABOUT HOW WELL WE'VE STUCK TO THE SUBJECT 
|
|
| Apr 29th, 2003 08:13 PM | ||
| Mockery | Yeah, it must be serious if the subject hasn't gone from board rules to a discussion about the physics of a rhubarb cannon by the end of page 1. | |
| Apr 29th, 2003 07:49 PM | ||
| slavemason |
Six fucking pages And you stuck to the subject It's time for a change |
|
| Apr 29th, 2003 07:18 PM | ||
| Mockery | The ignore feature probably isn't going to be implemented, at least not yet. I'm still waiting to hear back from the guy who wrote it... | |
| Apr 29th, 2003 06:22 PM | ||
| Blackjack | Disclaimer! DISCLAIMER!!! | |
| Apr 29th, 2003 05:19 PM | ||
| UnDeath | if you do incorporate the ignore list, are you going to have a list in their profile to see who they are blocking? Kinda as a slap in the face to those blocked/ they'll know not to reply to their comments | |
| Apr 29th, 2003 02:28 PM | ||
| Mockery | Just wanted everybody's general input on the situation, which you have all given. As soon as I have the chance, I'm gonna sit down and work up a "forum guidelines" which myself and the other mods will start enforcing. Nothing too strict, it's just going to make some idiots think twice before they post more unwanted garble. | |
| Apr 29th, 2003 01:43 PM | ||
| KevinTheOmnivore |
I think it's up to the admins, primarily Roger, what it is that we will ultimately do here. So what will it be? Do you guys (ie. Doopa, Boogie, Roger, etc.) want us to vote on something, or have you already made a decision....? |
|
| Apr 29th, 2003 01:33 AM | ||
| CastroMotorOil | aye | |
| Apr 28th, 2003 11:41 PM | ||
| Jebus | Edit: Post deleted in fear of mindless repetition. | |
| Apr 28th, 2003 11:24 PM | ||
| The_Rorschach |
I second Carni's motion. All in favour? |
|
| Apr 28th, 2003 10:45 PM | ||
| Carnivore | This was a long time coming. Good riddance to those who are too stupid to know when to shut the fuck up. | |
| Apr 28th, 2003 10:31 PM | ||
| CaptainBubba |
Quote:
Personally I have no idea what you guys should do. A gayups forum sounds good, but in the long run would just encourage more bad juu-juu. Deleting the post count will make things even worse in the long run because in the mind of many newbs recognition=acceptance, thus without a post count the only other method for them is by constantly seeking attention, hence even more posting. Frequent locks or bannings is the most reasonable long term solution, but it makes me a sad panda. 
|
|
| Apr 28th, 2003 10:25 PM | ||
| Mockery |
Quote:
 And Jixby, don't worry about the over-moderating or anything. There's not gonna be some huge ban-fest or anything like that. I'm probably going to add another forum for general nonsense where people who basically want to try and be funny to impress each other can post whatever they want. General Blabber, however, will be reserved for random conversations that actually have some kind of a point. I'm definitely gonna keep an eye on things once the new rules are implemented... but we've got good moderators on here and I'm not worried about any of them going on some crazy power rush. Well maybe Mew would, but he's always been crazeh like dat. o.O |
|
| Apr 28th, 2003 10:16 PM | ||
| Jixby Phillips |
I've been thinking about what has gone on since this thread has started. I don't like people who don't have anything to say, but post anyway, but I also don't like people who do nothing but complain about the quality of posts. Just because a thread is started with any kind of point or agenda or something doesn't garuntee it's going to be good. So when a thread is posted that doesn't seem to have a point, it SHOULDN'T automatically be replied to with "This doesn't have a point! Mockery, lock this!" Without any moderation you have TOO many annoying threads/members, but when there's too much moderating it begins to feel like Nazi Germany. Moderators AND members need to learn to relax. New people are too grabby for acceptance and Moderators are begining to be too grabby for finding imperfections and excuses to lock or delete threads. |
|
| Apr 28th, 2003 10:07 PM | ||
| noob3 |
I'm Mr. Mockery! Visit our new sponsor, guys! 
|
|
| Apr 28th, 2003 10:04 PM | ||
| Mockery | I rest my case. | |
| Apr 28th, 2003 09:54 PM | ||
| noob3 |
Quote:
|
|
| Apr 28th, 2003 09:23 PM | ||
| The Retro Kat | I think the ban law should be something used very seldom, but necessary if someone is being a complete moron. We often use our mocking skills accumulated over the years to get rid of them, but they are now persistant and extremely stupid. And perhaps a vote should go through a panel of unbiased persons. | |
| Apr 28th, 2003 08:48 PM | ||
| davinxtk |
Hey, does anyone else remember when these I-Mockery "veterans" used to be able to expel the lower forms of life with their words, rather than bans and counts and the like? I remember when this board was a grand place. I remember when people couldn't afford to act like idiots, or they'd get their shit shredded by these once sharp-minded excuses for "veteran" "mockers". If you guys don't like the shit that's going on in General Blabber, RECLAIM YOUR OWN TERRITORY. How can you call yourselves mockers if you don't MOCK the ripe targets in front of you? Or I could be completely wrong, and banning Robo and Crunch might be a good idea. Of course, many of you would include me in that mass-banning, i'm sure. |
|
| Apr 28th, 2003 06:55 PM | ||
| FS |
Kasual Blabber. Sorry. Actually, I'm the only one that uses that name. I'm trying to start a Secret Evil Society of I-Mockery in Classifieds, but so far I've gotten no one to learn the secret code lingo in which we post. Though most people appreciate the shade of pink I used for our flag. |
|
| This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. | ||
