Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Gaming 'n Toys > 360 vs PS3 vs WII
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread: 360 vs PS3 vs WII Reply to Thread
Title:
Message
Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Dec 17th, 2006 07:02 PM
noob3 it was to stupidkraut baby dont be sad
Dec 17th, 2006 06:58 PM
Rongi ;_;
Dec 17th, 2006 06:57 PM
noob3 :eyeballs
Dec 17th, 2006 06:51 PM
Rongi uhh uhhh was that to me or stupidkraut
Dec 17th, 2006 06:48 PM
noob3
Quote:
Originally Posted by StupidKraut
The console war has been going on forever dumbass. It never stops as long as theres competition. This rotation however is looking like utter shit so far.
yeah good consoles that are better than the last are such utter shit why dont you get some money and quit bitchin about it loser
Dec 17th, 2006 06:04 PM
Rongi haha, the fact that you got all flustered by that only proves my point further.

and console wars dont go on forever, you dope. eventually as a couple years pass and people start getting each console they stop caring about which console is better than the other.

then console wars start all over again once the next systems get introduced.
Dec 17th, 2006 05:55 PM
ArrowX The console war has been going on forever dumbass. It never stops as long as theres competition. This rotation however is looking like utter shit so far.
Dec 17th, 2006 05:49 PM
Rongi yeah, but you're probably the same faggot who said that the last time there was a console war
Dec 17th, 2006 05:43 PM
ArrowX This whole Rotation is gonna be a joke, its like a fight between a CD-i the Jaguar, and the Sega 32X. They all suck but its just a matter of choosing who sucks less.
Dec 17th, 2006 05:28 PM
Rongi the reason i ask is because i saw people on amazon saying that the 360 looks like dogshit on a non hdtv screen. and the 360 is the only system i want :/

the wii is too gimmicky to last all that long. that and i bet nintendo is going to lose a lot of money due to being slapped with a couple lawsuits for all these idiots breaking their tvs and windows.

and the ps3 is way too fucking expensive, which sucks because the only reason i want one is for mgs4
Dec 17th, 2006 02:17 PM
EisigerBiskuit The graphics will be okay, not terrible, but text will become a new language during the magical transformation.
Dec 17th, 2006 02:12 PM
Rongi do graphics look like shit on a regular tv with a 360?
Dec 17th, 2006 11:50 AM
Immortal Goat http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoCD9TwLrVs

OHEMJEE TEH GRAFFICKS
Dec 17th, 2006 11:36 AM
Immortal Goat I can see the headlines now:

PS3 discovers cure for cancer; ^^vv<><> B A
Dec 17th, 2006 06:47 AM
James fdsafasdfas
Dec 17th, 2006 02:00 AM
Chojin NOBODY LOVES SONY ANYMORE ;_;

http://search.ebay.com/search/search...=playstation+3
Dec 2nd, 2006 01:38 PM
MarioRPG How kawaii.
Dec 2nd, 2006 01:17 PM
Chojin JPN LAUNCH ^^;;
Dec 1st, 2006 03:54 PM
Comrade Rocket thats my main problem with the ps3. In order to actually enjoy what the system has to offer you have to drop almost 3000 dollars. i dont have 3000 dollars, i barely had the 300 i dropped on my wii and a game. and so far from what i have seen its not that impressive. the two games i played were NBA 2k7 which is unfair to judge because it generally looked like a peice of crap. The sweat coming off the people looked more like they were covered in a plastic shell. the other game i played was some ATV game. And while the ATVs were insanely detailed. And it was cool when you crashed because they took the time the detail small car parts that anyone besides a mechanic wouldnt be able to recognize. But the ground and walls looked HORRIBLE. They were still heavely pixelated and kinda blurry. I dont know if thats because it was on a plasma and not the HDTV, but if thats the case sony is dead last for me... like behind the N-GAGE last. I dont want to have to buy a HDTV in order to play metal gear solid 4 so snake doesnt look like hes a pile of pixels and blurs fighting other pixels and blurs in pixel and blur land.

METAL GEAR BLURRY.
Nov 30th, 2006 09:30 PM
Chojin Sony's biggest problem here isn't price directly in my opinion, it's that their games look the same as every other console if you don't have an expensive HDTV. And at launch, it looks about as good as current 360 games even with an HDTV. Of course, Microsoft's had a year to grow their graphics and I don't doubt the PS3 will trump them in that category in as much time. Screenshots I've seen of coming games for the PS3 in HD are nothing short of brilliant and if all the consoles were the same price I'd probably go with the PS3 as my secondary console. Adding motion-sensing and nixing vibration at the last minute was a hilariously pathetic move on Sony's part, but stealing from Nintendo is what tiggers do best, I guess ;<

James, you keep saying 'who buys a PS3 for movies' and then turn around and say that a standalone blu-ray player is $400 more than Sony's ultra-expensive system. So, I would imagine a lot of people who buy PS3s will do it for the movie-playing format. I also agree with the sentiment that HD-DVD will trounce Blu-Ray, if for no other reason than people know what DVDs are and they know that HD means 'good'. Also, I realize that the NES came out more than 20 years ago, but that's just proof that even 90% market share and longevity to rival Christianity can't save your subsequent systems from failure (not to say that the SNES failed, but it had less market share and the N64 all but tanked). The lesson that I think we all should have learned from the PS2 is that even the least powerful system can win it big - even without first-party support - as long as you have a lot of people making games for it. The PS3 is so fundamentally different from anything that's worked for Sony in the past that to compare it to their other consoles is actually less accurate than comparing it to its competition.

Also, as I understand it, the 360 uses a format of DVD that is higher density than normal DVD while not being HD-DVD. I could be wrong.
Nov 30th, 2006 09:03 PM
darklycan Xbox 360: The 360 seems like a second next-gen console I would get when it has a good value pack with it. (Thats what I did with my Xbox). ATM the main selling point for the 360 for me is some of the games, Dead Rising would be a game I would start afresh everyday mostly becasue I love horror movies. However for christmas i'm going down to Melbourne and my Cousin has a 360 so I'll see what it is like before I make my mind up about it.

Wii: The console I am picking up on December the 7th. I have always had a soft spot for nintendo becasue nothing make a VERY LONG car trip seem shorter than my gameboy. Also 1st party games from nintendo have been the only ones that have stood out for me. PS2 and Xbox 1st party games weren't eye raising for me. Also Nintendo usually has the genres of games I like, so that another selling point for me. Finally the third party support at lunch is getting me giddy becasue after the gamecube's horrible 3rd party support I was starting to get a little worried but if 3rd party produces are intrested in making games for the Wii, then I'm excited!

PS3: Hmmm whats to say? This console won't be out in Australia till MARCH, which really shows how much Sony gives a damn about Australia and while consoles usually release later in Aus, its has never been this bloody long. Improved graphics is always a good thing and being able to experiance it will be something else. At this time I'll have to wait before me final decision on the PS3

Overall: The Wii is my first choice for better or for worse. I will have to see what the 360 and PS3 are truley like before I make up my mind.
Nov 30th, 2006 08:29 PM
ArrowX The 360 has High Definition games but not an HD DVD drive. The HD-DVD drive is a $200 add on.

And about the whole multiple disks thing. I've been wondering why there aren't any of those anymore! I remember back in the day that it was pretty much a contest to see who had the game with the most disks, and that if there was more than one disk it was a fucking bombshell as well.
Nov 30th, 2006 08:15 PM
Microshock Eh ps3 sucks....



wii owns..

im tired of the same old gameplay...at least nintendo offers something new which is gonna be a success like they proved with the ds...which beat the psp and nintendo still owns 75 percent of the handheld gaming market.
Nov 30th, 2006 07:59 PM
James dsfasdfsaf
Nov 30th, 2006 07:10 PM
noob3 Seriously, is that all it does? More storage? Are you shitting me? Do we really need MORE STORAGE in this day in age? Alot of my games have more than 1 disc and I've never thought of as a hassle or anything. I mean, it makes me think I'm getting more for my buck! It's like 2 games for the price of one, man! They're making us pay more so they can spend less on discs

This is somthing they should reconsider! More discs! Less storage!

Am I right guys?
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:50 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.