Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > General Blabber > Another reason why PETA sucks
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Thread: Another reason why PETA sucks Reply to Thread
Title:
Message
Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Jul 21st, 2003 04:17 PM
The Retro Kat I wish we still had public executions.
Jul 21st, 2003 02:40 PM
Grande im waiting for the headline: PETA attacks african government for allowing lions living in their countries to kill animals.
Jul 3rd, 2003 06:11 PM
ScruU2wice thats wat u say now. wait till they start theyre rising, ull be wistling a different toon then
Jul 3rd, 2003 03:38 PM
Daphne yeah.....I wish cows were as smart as you too.
Jul 3rd, 2003 02:33 PM
ScruU2wice
Quote:
Originally Posted by glowbelly
ummmmm. i hate to play devil's advocate here, but just exactly who or what should be held responsible for animal cruelty? animals?
i think u fulla bullshit, u luv playing Devils Advocate.

Humans need a form of survival, eating food is one of them. Of course there are other ways to obtain nutrition ie. takin vitamin pills every morning.

How exactly is eatin a veggie burger made out of harvested soy beans any different from ranching cattle to mak a beef pattie

Furthermore, I think its naive to think that if cows had the intellegence that god bestowed on to humans then they wouldnt be eating humans
Jun 22nd, 2003 03:03 AM
KevinTheOmnivore Thanks for the advice, brah.
Jun 21st, 2003 09:58 PM
Big Papa Goat
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinTheHerbivore
Serious as a heart attack.

And yet you guys still can't understand why they do things like this.
I know that you vegitarians, non smokers, non drinkers, joggers, fitness buffs, etc etc, entertain some eternal life fantasy, but guess what? It ain't gonna happen cousin. Everybody dies, be it from a heart attack, cancer, HIV, shot in the back of the head whatever, your gonna die, so you might as well have some fun while you're here.
Jun 13th, 2003 12:18 AM
K-nonFodder Peta is a childish group who results to violence because "we" are hurtin animals kinda friggin redundant, humans are animals too
Jun 4th, 2003 02:31 PM
KevinTheOmnivore Retardville is another good one, I just wouldn't know where to put it, so many great options.
Jun 4th, 2003 01:45 AM
The_voice_of_reason I'm going to found a city and name it Killandeatanimalsbecausethey'retastyville or just tastyville i havn't decided yet.
May 31st, 2003 05:44 PM
Generator86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mockery
To sum it up:

"Your actions speak so loud I can't hear a word you're saying..." -Graffin
Sorry to be a stickler, Mock, since this probably isn't the place, but it was Gurewitz who wrote that. Eh, I'm just being critical since that's what I was going to write. Oh, well.
May 29th, 2003 04:20 PM
Mockery You're just as bad as PETA.

May 29th, 2003 03:28 PM
choptop EEEEEUUUGHHHH! The City kiyud wants to make threats at me! You must be one of them alien, chineese communist pinkos! Dawg will hunt!
May 29th, 2003 11:56 AM
Daphne I'd just rather you died.
May 29th, 2003 11:15 AM
choptop Id rather die with a gut full of grease and beef than with that commie diet of vegetables, and those fuckin' "rice cakes" rice is for commies!
May 28th, 2003 02:10 PM
Daphne thanks for proving my point.
May 28th, 2003 01:21 PM
kellychaos I think it's funny that they're so afraid of criticism, that they registered the www.petasucks.com domain name.
May 28th, 2003 10:23 AM
Daphne I agree, but sadly logic doesn't work to get people's attention a lot of the time.

I don't think that PETA's methods are good a lot of the time, but it does get them attention and it does get more people interested in their cause (no bad publicity yadda yadda).

I find, however, that people love to point out the stupid shit that PETA does, instead of praising them when they get something accomplished. Pessimists
May 27th, 2003 11:20 PM
Mockery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daphne
so what do you suggest anti-cruelty activists do to get their point accross?
Using logic and reason is a much better route to take than shock and violence. There's plenty of activists out there who get a lot done for their cause without having to become public clowns whose message is obscured by their own pathetic actions.
May 27th, 2003 05:57 PM
glowbelly NOTHING DAPHNE. YOU JUST SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP WHILE I STUFF MY FACE WITH VEAL, NAME MY FUR COATS AND INJECT BUNNIES WITH MY MASCARA.
May 27th, 2003 12:33 PM
Daphne so what do you suggest anti-cruelty activists do to get their point accross?
May 26th, 2003 04:30 PM
Mockery
Quote:
Originally Posted by glowbelly
ummmmm. i hate to play devil's advocate here, but just exactly who or what should be held responsible for animal cruelty? animals?
http://www.I-Mockery.com/Meatatarian/branded.htm

This is why groups like PETA and the ALF are bad... because many of their followers are actually mentally insane. I think animal cruelty is shitty and would never buy fur or anything, but some activists get so worked up that they'll bomb a McDonald's or do what they did to this poor bastard (who is an activist).

PETA just preys on the easily influenced youth who are looking for some purpose and meaning in their lives, along with the excitement of being "shocking" and "controversial". But, like most kids, they're often too stupid to distinguish right from wrong and end up taking things too far in the name of their empty cause.

PETA's antics hurt their cause much more than helping it simply because of their extreme nature. People are too busy laughing at the nude protestors to bother thinking about whether or not they should buy fur.

To sum it up:

"Your actions speak so loud I can't hear a word you're saying..." -Graffin
May 2nd, 2003 01:55 AM
BlueOatmeal These people are a bunch of zealots! They do these acts with blinders and could care less if innocent humans are harmed. They proved that when they fired bombed a McDonalds and one innocent person was killed.

Theres noting wrong with doing what you belive in but these people take it to an extreme.
May 1st, 2003 01:18 PM
Carnivore There's a difference between preventing animal cruelty and promoting animal equality.
May 1st, 2003 10:01 AM
glowbelly ummmmm. i hate to play devil's advocate here, but just exactly who or what should be held responsible for animal cruelty? animals?
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.