|
I use to have an account at a stupid music site that keeps track of what you listen to on your computer. And it makes a list of people that have similar taste. One of them was a person from the UK that GUITAR WOMAN once used has a picture of her girlsona. This was after the whole major outting though.
|
Hey Chojin, when you discovered the truth, was it not unlike that part in Ace Ventura where he burned his clothes and induced vomiting?
|
Quote:
|
Part of me thinks he knew all along and was just waiting for the right moment :<
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I had no idea then that I'd turn out to be the pretty young man I am today!
|
[GW'S SERIOUS HOMO PROBLEMS PICTURE]
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
For the secret santa thing - I always kind of thought it was bullshit that ojb wasn't banned or anything for fucking up that one year. I didn't post my pictures until like february the first year, which was also kind of shitty for everyone else. But I guess it was the first year and WE ALL LEARNED FROM IT.
I'm fine with the way it is now though. I thought jixby was one of the few funny people left on the forums, but I like that the rules are actually being stuck to for once. It sucks, but boogie's right; everyone knew the rules when they signed up. |
So back on the topic I was talking about!
Boogie, those are all people we banned this year, who have been banned for about 3 months now. Everyone of note that was banned from previous santas has been unbanned. This is my point. I think it's a shame we should lose members that have been with us for years and years over secret santa presents, of all things. I don't see why we shouldn't bring them back and change the rules to reflect this new policy. So, I'll ask again - what is the point of permanently banning people over secret santa? The threat clearly doesn't stop people. Does anyone think that if the ban was for six or three months that more people would sign up and not send out gifts? Is it really as grievous an offense as hijacking someone's account or filling the boards with dickgirl porn? |
Serious topics in my thread? :rolleyes
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
You need to move on, pub. The edit button sure has.
|
I'm kinda secretly glad I don't have it. It's an excuse.
I'm not sure why I lost it though. :confused Quote:
|
Pub, did you msn me?
|
|
Yeah, I like hitting on girls that are secretly guys. It's way less scary than talking to real girls. :chatter
|
I'm the hottest
|
Quote:
|
Get me some 37 year old hotty girl pics
|
Quote:
The point is that you yourself set down the rules for this, and now you want to go back on them. I think you put down the perma-ban remark in the hopes that it would deter casual posters and newbies alike from joining in just to fuck things up, without ever intending to follow through with it. And why not? As you pointed out, there certainly was a precedent for ignoring the people who fucked up. But last year, we had some people who didn't post shit, and they just happened to be vets. These were people you'd expect to follow through with a board event (and Noob3), but they didn't for one reason or another. And I was cool with that, for a long while. But eventually, I felt like we should enforce the rules, and I wanted it to apply to all the offenders, with no special treatment for the vets. As for why people from previous years weren't banned, I have no answer for that, apart from that responsibility for banning them should have fallen on whoever was running the event that year. If you want, we can go back and ban all those people. |
LAYING DOWN THE LAW
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:59 AM. |
|
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.