Quote:
|
For the Big Bang to take place, there must have been a force from beyond the universe that acted upon the point-particle universe in transcendence of the nature of time.
|
Cpt is right. You are making a demand, you're not proving anything. What should and must exist according to a mode of thinking does not nec. agree with what indeed comes to pass. The difference between demanding something to be so and actually proving it to be so should be obvious to you.
At a point in time (not not-yet-time as it may be) where time as you say is not yet an extended dimension our (generally applicable) concept of cause and effect (as expressed in this case in the sequence of god setting the universe in motion) does not apply to these special conditions since cause and effect is dependent on the presupposition of linear motion of time. The specific time sequence in which your god wills the universe in motion is thusly a logical irrelevancy when time is not yet a linear context.
So much for your proof of god's existence. Insert coin to continue.