View Single Post
  #14  
ranxer ranxer is offline
Member
ranxer's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: U$
ranxer is probably a spambot
Old Jan 19th, 2004, 10:05 AM       
just because i don't like what moore is doing on one subject doesnt mean i don't agree with many other cases he has made.

after re-reading his wes endorsements i see his points.. he may be right about southern states.. i still don't have to like the position those on the left are in.. there's going to be a lot of backstabbing and reshuffling of 'alliegences' over this election.

i don't agree that moore is any kind of sellout.. i just havnt seen it.
really blanco where do you get the idea that he cares more about money than the country or the world?
i've seen him working very hard to help out this country for nothing but respect and a sense of community. if you read his arguements, his endorsement is less a statement for clark and more an effort to unseat bush.

i'm with him on the concept that if people have never gotten together to win in past elections.. if they have supported the underdog.. voted for who they believe to be the best candidate instead of who is more electable in past elections.. this one is different. its time for those of us who have ALWAYS voted for the best candidate and lost to vote for the most 'electable' dem.

this will be a first for me(voting for the electable.. just as voting dem heeh).. and i'm not totally convinced its the way to go yet (sheesh, there's plenty more campaigning to do in my state before tha primary), but i'm leaning toward 'anybody but bush' and, i will be very cynical about it.

i do not want to supprt clark.. i don't want to support dean, but if either of those two get the dem ticket .. fuck i'm going to support the lesser of two evils. argh
__________________
the neo-capitalists believe in privatizing profits and socializing losses
Reply With Quote