Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ronnie Raygun
"My point:
Why are we nearly completely ignoring a country that presents more of a risk than Iraq has for the last decade?" - phen
Ok, now I understand.
With Iraq there were 11 and 1/2 years of diplomatic attempts to try to get Saddam to provide proof that he had destroyed his WMD. We have just begun diplomacy with Nortn Korea.
|
Bullshit. Dubya Industries, Inc., wanted proof that he
had them, not that he had destroyed them. And you know that. We
have proof that he destroyed them. 'Cause, you know, there aren't any there.
Besides, why the hell would we be more worried about someone we
think has WMD, when we've got another, more belligerent nation, screaming at the top of their lungs, "HEY, AMERICAN FUCKSTICKS, WE HAVE A NUKE! AND WE'RE MAKING MORE! AND WE'LL USE THEM, TOO!" Gee, which one is the greater threat, and should be dealt with first?
Because if thirteen years of searching turned up nothing, it sure does invalidate the claim that Saddam had weapons deployable within 45 minutes.
Congratulations, Ronnie. You have deomnstrably mastered the art of doublethink.
"We are at war with Eurasia. We have always been at war with Eurasia."