View Single Post
  #16  
sspadowsky sspadowsky is offline
Will chop you good.
sspadowsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Thrill World
sspadowsky is probably a spambot
Old Mar 10th, 2004, 11:06 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Fairandbalanced
Just look at U.N. resolution 1441. Saddam had to prove that the WMD were destroyed to avoid war. Man, you really hate the facts, don't you?
How do you prove you've destroyed weapons that you've destroyed? And, in typical Raygun fashion, you miss the point, because it is you who cannot face the facts: Remember the smoking guns we were looking for? The ones we still haven't found? Because they're not there. Because they were either destroyed, or were never there in the first place. How do you prove what's not there isn't there? I defy you, Mr. Fair-and-balanced, to answer that question, rather than coming back with "damn, you're ignorant," and not following it up with any argument as to why I'm ignorant, or even wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Fairandbalanced
We weren't searching that whole time and when we were, we were still handicapped by Saddam. Did you not know that?
We haven't been handicapped for a year, and we still haven't found shit. And you can bet that they've been running through that country with a goddamn microscpoe since March 19 of last year. Not a damn thing. And you still can't explain why.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Fairandbalanced
Saddam, because he WASN'T screaming and throwing a tantrum like Jong Il. Diplomacy hasn't been exausted there. Do you even know how he got those nukes? We wouldn't even be in this situation if Bill Clinton hadn't given the ability to make nukes.
Now this is one of my favorite parts. You have to be one silly bastard to think that diplomacy is going to go any better with Jong-Il than it did with Saddam. 'Cause, see, the difference is that we KNOW he has WMD. And we knew Saddam DIDN'T, which was why Bush was so eager to saddle 'em up and start firin' them sixguns. Diplomacy, shit. War in Iraq was a foregone conclusion even before 9/11. We have no choice but to be diplomatic with N Korea, because they do have nukes, that, by intelligence estimates, could possibly reach the West coast of the US.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Fairandbalanced
I guarentee you when it comes time to deal with North Korea, you will not support it.....unless a democrat is in office of course. You are way more partisan than I am, and that's saying something.
Actually, it's not saying anything, because you don't know fuck-all about my leanings, except that I don't like the Bush Administration, because they're the biggest liars and manipulators since Nixon.

At any rate, you have no idea what I'm going to say or do no matter how we deal with... well, anything. So why don't you get back to trying to prove me wrong (which, thus far, you have failed to do), rather than speculate on shit you know nothing about?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Fairandbalanced
Damn, you're ignorant. Just keep talking, it makes me look like a fucking genius.
The doublethink quote is probably the most appropriate one that anyone has ever directed at you. You will never, ever, admit that you're wrong. You just change your opinion and pretend that's the way you thought the whole time. You make a great administration lap-dog, Ronnie.
__________________
"If honesty is the best policy, then, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy. Second is not all that bad."
-George Carlin
Reply With Quote