|
Mocker
|
 |
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: WestPac
|
|

Apr 1st, 2004, 10:27 PM
Pern, there is a difference between a Theorem and a Theory. A Theorem has been demonstrated to be true, a Theory has not. Newton's Theory of Motion is a Theorem, Darwin's Theory of Evolution is not. Just because laymen don't appreciate the difference doesn't mean all should likewise ignore it.
And Ziggy you're quite correct.
In context of the topic, animal experimentation, I think more effort ought to go into the formation of hypothesis and the conclusion speculated before testing is done. I feel the Scientific community has become entirely too relaxed, going by the current vein of projects.
For instance, take the above example. Newton's Theory of Motion, the amount of effort and observation which into the initial hypothesis is vastly different than say, 'how will insects be effected by a change in gravity.' A hypothesis should be like a mission statement not some vague curiousity.
|
|
|
|