[kahljorn]

"You're using you're own concept of reality here, one that is subjective to observation. I wasn't playing that game, because it's lame and irrelevant. "

Because it is a perceptual reality it must be true, and true must be true for true is true, is this not true? You just used your own concept of reality to denounce my fragment of reality, and because of this I must be wrong? Incorrect. Both of us must be wrong, and right, and wrong about being right and right about being wrong and neither wrong nor right.
There is no observation of this, only the representation, you can attempt to observe the representation, but come on.. you can't observe the subtle unknowns that are known only to another, it's like another existance/reality/universe in another person's mind, and you can never go there... how lonely are you!
I Just woke up from being drunk and passed out, I'm stylish.

So you are correct, it is irrelevant, but how can it be irrelevant in a discussion about the inifinite, which wo uld include the UNKOWNS to you. How theological/philisophical do you want to get.

I've read plenty of philosophy, for I am planty the plant, and I can plant seeds of plants.