Quote:
|
Just consider the source, folks.
|
And that's what's called
ad hominem. Go look it up on google or something. Kahl may be all these things, but it stands he generally knows way more about occultism than you (as I've gathered) and him being a drunk or whatever doesn't really impair his ability to call bulshit when he sees it.
And actually, considering the source, as you said, Kahl is generally positvely predesposed towards occultism (in direct contrast to my disposition), so it's even more telling that he doesn't give the vampire people any credit.
Maybe you should become a proper Nietszche-ist, the philosophy of whom is after all, the formal basis of all these 'life feeds on life' occult bulshit, and be done with it. No shame in not wearing a cape and fake teeth.
(ps I won't follow this thread (or any other, actually) so don't bother replying point by point and all. Internet cafes
)