|
BANNED
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
|
|

Aug 12th, 2004, 06:07 PM
nope, my friend says he doesnt have the artical anymore, it was prolly shammy anyway.
But on the topic....
There's a few flaws with your sentiments of the Many World's Theory. First off, you presume our universe is somehow the most important one, and thus, different worlds would coalesce from our universe. While chances our, our universe was born of another, in the case of "Many Worlds".
Secondly, all the ideas of science and logic falter when it comes to existance actually being existance. Everything came from absolute nothing, and not the nothing of an empty pot. The nothing of eternal nothing, where there could be no future or past. The illogical consequence of the u niverse still somehow managing to exist would somehow seem to signify that, somewhere beyond the borders of our existance, other existances would most likely have sprung up like bermuda grass.
Of course, not being in our existance(at the current point in time) makes them nonexistant.
This would lapse into my "theory" of "Cellular Division" perse. Evolution of existance, or whatever word is above existance, and above GOD.
|
__________________
NEVER
|
|
|