[HNICPantitude]

Pantydude, you're the villian of the moment for precisely the reason you say is inconsequential in Bush. You can articulate your thoughts. I say that such a quality is neccesary for good leadership. I won't argue whether W is actually stupid or not. I don't know him.

I would say the same thing regarding Kerry. I would take a nervous public speaker who can articulate his plan any day of the week over a candidate who could not articulate one single point or any semblance of a plan.

I will argue that intellectual curiosity and communication skills are esential leadership qualitiesm and I will argue that W. Lacks both in spades.

Exit polls showed something missed by our sterling media up until now. The most important issue in the minds of voters was not Iraq, not the economy, it was morality.

Exit Polls have repeatedly been proven to be a farce. Yesterdays election polls were an embarassment for the media.

Will you argue any of these points.

A.) The President can imbue a nation with morality by some sort of moral osmosis.

I do not believe a president can imbue a nation with morality any more than I believe a movie can imbue a nation with morality. A president is merely a vessel to represent the country in its current stance on moral issues. Would you argue that moral issues had nothing to do with yesterday's victory? George Bush did not give me my values, nor does he influence them.

B.) This president is more moral then Kerry, or particularly moral at all.

I am of the firm belief that this president is much more moral than Kerry in his beliefs, but again, I didn't vote for George Bush for his moral stance on any issue. If you are heading down the road of religion, I will comment on that also. I am not a "born again" Christian. To be quite honest, I am not very religious at all. I have a religion, which I practice about once every other year, when my parents whine about it at Christmas, and manipulate me into participating. Outside of that, I believe religion represents a set of morals to live by, and nothing more.

C.) The most importnat reason to pick a candidate is their percieved morality.

I absolutely believe a candidates perceived moral value has a place, but, no, not the most important reason to pick a candidate whatsoever.

D.) Morality is important is of primary importance as a leadership quality.

Morality, I would hope, in a very general definition, should be important in any venture in life.

E.) A person's morality is reflected by accepting Jesus as your personal.
savior.

That's an assinine question, and I believe only posed to instigate an argumentative response.

F.) Making noise about a constitutional ammendment banning Gay Marriage is a sincerely moral issue, and reflects moral character.

I don't believe in gay marriage, and I have also repeatedly stated that I disagree with george Bush's stance on this position. I have never once changed my stance on that argument. I believe in a very limited Federal Constitution, and a very Liberitarian like interpretation of such. In my personal opinion, we should be very careful in setting precedent amending the Constitution every time we dont like something. To me, it is no different than my argument against removing the word ****** from the dictionary. Why would I argue that? I am not a proponent of using the word, but a precedent would have been set to remove words each time a group deemed that word offensive or unnacceptable in some way, highly akin to revisionist history.

You are now part of our country's entrenched ruling elite. There is no longer any chance of the party of opposition doing much of anything for at very least two years. I'd expect that as opposed to spouting any no longer neccesary party line (like you've accused others here of doing) you'd answer these questions honestly as they pertain to you and your beliefs.


I think there's a qualitative difference between you and Naldo. I don't know f either of you is really stupid. You, though, can communicate. You waited for the opponent to concede before glaoting, which shows you don't suffer from the premature ejaculation which so weakens Naldo. You're the man. Step up and defend. Kerry lost. You have no one to run against. It's time for you to run for.

Suppport this thug, explain his culture of liofe which includes the unborn yet approves the death penalty and shows no interest at all in the 'collateral damage' to a country that wasn't Afghanistan. Lets look together for freedom on the march and the halving of our defficit. I look forward to it.