[Helm]

So your willing something into existence validates it? Blow it out your ass.

Incoherent reply, conviniently avoiding my argument.

I think you're clutching at straws and trying to use obfuscation to further your point. I understand where you're going with it, and there's a kernel of validity, but not enough to build an argument around.

I'm not clutching at straws as much as you'd like to think. I have two very sturdy foundations, based on which I can bend this any way I like. First, linguistics is really the sophist's playfield. Second, you're a fag.

As a second example, the term 'emphirical' which you used, is directly associated with philosophy, as in means of supplying evidence. Is that in code too? Your secret fag code? [/code]

Also, you must know that the behavior you're demonstrating would have the exact opposite effect you claim to want (shutting me up).

Maybe I don't want you to shut up at all. Maybe I don't think you're really a fag, either. Maybe this is behaviour I'm demonstrating is what we do to pass the time around here.


Plus also, I was not raised in an Orthodox household, so I have no idea what you're talking about. Fag.