[kellychaos]

Not defending Bush here but why does every argument against Bush end up being a pro-Clinton jag? It's an apples-and-oranges, red-herring way to argue and I find it pathetic. I mean, most of the same members of the the intelligence community have been around for at least a few administrations ... including Clinton's. That being said, although I'm not totally on board with Ward What's-his-face's (Colorado professor) argument, I do believe there is a little truth in that a few Reagan chickens have come to roost as of late. Just sayin'