View Single Post
  #10  
ranxer ranxer is offline
Member
ranxer's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: U$
ranxer is probably a spambot
Old Jun 15th, 2005, 04:50 PM       
crap! i forgot a link to the whole article..
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles...8131/27302.htm

quote]Quote:
Reynolds, now a professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, also believes it's 'next to impossible' that 19 Arab Terrorists alone outfoxed the mighty U.S. military, adding the scientific conclusions about the WTC collapse may hold the key to the entire mysterious plot behind 9/11.

What is this refering to? The terrorists were only against airport security weren't they? And weren't they are all seen on security tapes from the airports later? Was there evidence found to point to a controlled explosion?[/quote]

there's lots of scientific evidence that it was a demolition.
1) the buildings came down at freefall speed..(10 seconds) this would require that nothing was below the floors that supposedly buckled
2) the buildings came down despite the fact that the fires were going out. (dark black smoke indicates a smothered or dieing fire)
2a) people were standing in the wholes the planes made, showing that there was no raging fire.
3) fires have never brought down steel structured buildings
the wtc buildings were designed to withstand large commercial jet lliner impacts.
4) the buildings came straight down! i could understand maybe one but three buildings diving straight down into thier footprints? no way.. especially when none of the planes hit dead center.
5) fires in the rubble lasting weeks and burning much higher than jet fuel or regular refuse fires.
6) PULVERIZED concrete ejected from many floors would not have been there if the buildings simply collapsed..
7) (not so scientific)reports of repeating explosions by firefighters and people on the scene.

um, that's just a quick list.. i'm sure there's more evidence.. ask a demolition expert about some of these.. or a structural engineer that hasn't taken the blue pill all the way.

oh and the comments about an economist knowing what happened on 9/11 are silly.. I saw it right away and i didn't even graduate with my engineering degree.. as a matter of fact.. high school science is all you need to debunk the bush admins conspiracy theory.

[/quote]
__________________
the neo-capitalists believe in privatizing profits and socializing losses
Reply With Quote