Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kahljorn
"al Queda is responsible for the 9/11 attacks"
You don't know who's responsible for the attacks, and the fact that you assume so because someone else(I doubt it was someone with direct knowledge, too) told you or put that idea in your head is just as desperate and deranged as any conspiracy theororist.
|
Have Osama Bin Laden or Al Qaeda ever
denied responsibility for the attack? Sure, they could just lie and take credit for it, but you can't compare the veracity of the two arguments as equally "deranged."
I don't think Geggy is deranged, but if expert after expert says Al Qaeda did it, and if
most people you meet say Al Qaeda did it, and if Al Qaeda says Al Qaeda did it (!), then wouldn't that weigh heavily against Geggy's argument???
Quote:
|
The doubt he has for 9/11 is reasonable, even if within your mind he is approaching it from an unreasonable angle, but his argument seems clear enough. Why do you even pretend to debate if you have no inclination on at least listening? At the very least he offered evidence, all you offer is rhetoric that's not even yours.
|
He offered links to websites such as "whatreallyhappened.com." the other, 911 research, is run by four people, I think two of them with degrees in the subject, one of them an architect, if my memory serves me correctly. Their arguments again aren't necessarily crazy, but if I put one architect in the room who says one thing, and stack up 10 others against him that say another, which argument shall we believe?