I think the webmaster of whatreallyhappened.com has already made it clear that he's not anti-jewish but an anti-israel. Big difference. Thr reason for that is because the US has been giving israel 9 billion dollars a year when they should've used the money on poverty in the US. If you want anti-semite, go to
www.halturnershow.com. I swear that guy is hitler's ghost.
All I'm saying si that if the WTC buildings were indeedy imploded, which it looks a lot like it to me, then why was the cover up neccessary? Maybe they thought if they told everyone the buildings were imploded, it would raise suspicions that it was an inside job? I think we all know it'd be impossible for anyone in the al qaeda group to bypass security and set up detonators inside the buildings, which takes months to do. Or were they were trying to explain and make it look like the buildings fell due to the impact of planes flown by hijackers in order to help the owner of WTC to claim 3 billion something dollars in insurance? Did they purposedly pull WTC7, where the headquarter offices of CIA, FBI and FEMA were located, to get rid of evidences? Did they want someone inside WTC dead (if you're interested in this subject, read The Man Who Knew, the story of former FBI John ONeill)?
I've read the 9/11 commision report and played "connect the dots" in the book. All I got was a picture of a bull shitting on the doorstep in front of your house. And I've played "connect the dots" with the evidences provided in the internet, books, movies, along with known facts, witness statements, etc, and I've come to a picture what looks like dick cheney taking a shit in a sandbox in the backyard of your house, while you're sitting on your EZ chair, eating big, fat, juicy steak, drinking american beer and watching a baseball game on your 42 inch plasma LCD flatscreen HDTV.
Blanco, I read the post that your family members claimed there was no explosion before the collapse. Now I'm going to contradict myself a little here(hey I'm only human)...I was watching the 9/11 documentary filmed by 2 french brothers (and ironically narrated by robert deniro who starred in "wag the dog") a while ago. It showed the first tower collapsing (in slow motion!) and squibs shooting out were clearly visible, no question. But then when it got to the second tower collapsing part, one of the french brothers filiming who was inside the buidling was walking away from the tower. When he was about several feet away, the tower started collapsing and he started running. It didn't show the shockwaves or smoke coming out of the bottom of the building prior to the collapse. It seemed odd because I've seen several video clips on the internet showing smokes. I thought, with the technology they have now, images could be easily manipulated by using photoshop or CGI programs. I have no doubt the documentary was carefully edited. I have no doubts images everywhere have been manipulated. But the question is what am I supposed to believe?