[kahljorn]

"I brought up irreducible compexity as a point to discuss in order to keep the discussion going a bit."

It worked, and now you're bitching about it?

"As ziggy sort of indicated, it's an interesting logic puzzle."

Um, sure. So interesting it took five minutes to figure out, which coincidentally is about how long it took for me to see your post and type a response...

""You cannot remove someone's heart, so you're stupid,""

On behe's webpage his explaination for irreducible complexity is as follows: There's a mousetrap, it has three pieces. If you take out any of those three pieces, the mousetrap will no longer work. This proves evolution wrong. In the human body, there's alot of pieces, but a few primary ones. If you take out one of the primary pieces, the human body will no longer work. This proves evolution wrong.
Obviously I was using the exact same logical model to make it look stupid. Essentially i was 'mocking' it, mimicing it, in a way that looked blatantly stupid to show how blatantly stupid the initial claim is. "This wouldn't work if you remove this" "This wouldn't work if you remove this", same syntax, same solution just a differing response (from you) because it's something accepted in everyday life as true, hence my usage of it. All you've really done with your response is to satisfy exactly what i was trying to point out. It's like you work on my team or something.
That wasn't my argument against Behe anyway, you know what it was and it seemed people have agreed with it before, I don't really need to say anything more on that particular topic-- you just need to shield your eyes and pretend nothing happened. So untwist your panties and quit picking out bullshit delusions to throw my way-- they don't work.