|
|
|
Mocker
|
 |
|
|
|
Feb 5th, 2006, 02:28 AM
Why make the exception for when the mother's life is endangered? It's not like we would condone bombing a village to contain an epidemic, even if it would save more lives in the long run.
What do you consider the moral status of the fertilized egg? Is it a 'potential' human life or already a human life? Do you oppose morning after pills/embryonic stem cell research?
| |
| |
|
|