Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ziggytrix
I believe I've given this link before, and I cannot recall your response if you had one, but this is about as close to what you're asking for that I know of. Maybe you ignored it because it lacked pictures? |
Yes, you have... and I've not commented on it. I was talking to Kahl when I said that, and I didn't mean to imply that nobody had addressed my question directly. That being said, I would still argue with you that the concise representation you've provided still is eaving me lacking satisfaction, at least in a complete sense.
On it's own, I might be willing to stretch that far... BUT.
It's been my experience so far that things that cannot be explained concisely (by someone other than me) are generally to complicated to be real.