View Single Post
  #24  
kahljorn kahljorn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
kahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contest
Old May 4th, 2006, 10:36 PM       
Quote:
"It's difficult for me to accept that everything evolved from one common ancestor."
Why?
In some ways I can imagine life arising in more than one place. Is your objection to it because things are too complex? Because in reality if you look at things at a molecular or biological level everything is pretty much composed of the same parts, and not too complex. It's when you look at the big picture that it gets complicated. All life processes within every being pretty much functions off of the same fundamental biological proceses using, pretty much, the same materials for sustanance and maintanence.

Seriously I just don't understand your objection, and you haven't provided any.

Quote:
"My opinions in this debate actually extend from my personal philosophy"
What are your personal philosophies? Can we discuss those instead?

Quote:
"contrary to your presumption that the only folks that don't drink Darwin's Kool-Aid blindly are inbred hicks from the same trailer park in Mississippi."
I never said that. I think anybody can see the holes in the evolutionary theory, and that's partly why it's still a theory. They are attempting to fill those holes in. I see those holes, they are pretty obvious. I'm not in a trailor park in mississipi.

You still pussied out of our conversation, despite me being nice and cordial to you and even explaining the fundamentals of science and some basic concepts of the universe. You still haven't even shared your real objections to it. You don't have any logical reasons. It just, "Doesn't seem right". If that's all, then why did you even start an argument with me about it when I wasn't even talking about if evolution is true or false? if you're going to start an argument at least have some logical reason based in information.

You ragged on ME for using intuition without knowledge, so what the fuck is this? Do you purposely apply your own arguments to yourself? Why is it that everything you've said has contradicted yourself in some way or another?

You said you'd set out to prove me wrong if I was nice, and now you're backing out. That's about all I need to know about you, really, just don't confont me in the future unless you have a good reason and are planning on sticking to your guns.
__________________
NEVER
Reply With Quote