Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Preechr
To me, it's logically satisfying and pretty damn obvious that some clever diety created everything with a big bang at a scientifically proveable point in time about 4.5 billion years ago.
|
So you have no problem with the notion that all the matter in the universe was contained in a singularity at the Big Bang (which is estimated to be 13.7, not 4.5, billion years ago). But somehow we got a planet full of all these different species... well... how, if not thru macroevolution?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Supafly345
I am so suave. Watch me tell off these nerds.
|
Supafly, stick to drawing pretty pictures, OK? If anyone on this board has a habit of posting like they think they kick so much ass, you certainly aren't one to be calling them on it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pjalne
Preechr, I don't know how this discussion started and what you said that riled people up or vice versa.
|
Pj, his remarks that riled me were in Scru's "Politics in School" thread, and this one in particular bugs me:
"The main reason I hate this debate is that evolutionists generally refuse to admit that this is a debate of opinions and ultimately one of sociology rather than science." (emphasis mine)
Apparently geology, biology, and chemistry are all soft-science branches of sociology?
