Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
Does anyone have a direct citation from a credible source that people saw a 'missile' strike the Pentagon?
Does anyone have a direct citation from a credible source that the jet engine piece (presumably attachd to the missile, I guess...) was too small to be a 737?
|
The only references i have say several witnesses reported.. they have names and dates but what's the point? its someones word and can't be considered too credible by itself, my point in bringing it up sometimes is that witnesses of the pentagon attack don't agree on what they saw. this is not a big deal and not a strong refutation of the government story, so generally i'm ignoring it in the future.
regarding the engine part, i am having difficulty wading through the conflicting information. I've never been convinced that it wasn't an engine part from flight 77 so I will be printing out what i think is the most solid info and questioning some of the 'experts' on the 'conspiracy' theory about it at a conference in Chicago next month.
Kevin keeps repeating that geggy and i believe every crack pot website that submits an alternative theory to the bush admins story, this is not the case. the list of sites i trust is very short, the list of sites i don't trust is actually growing..
i'd venture to guess that some of them will drop out after domains expire but its a big mess, especially if you've only started looking into this stuff recently.
geggy refers to some of the best sites, cooperativeresearch.org is pretty solid from my perspective, not anything close to a crackpot website. another trustable resource is
www.globalresearch.ca
I'm not adding websites to my list by searching on google without knowing who exactly is behind the website. Who owns the domain, who is writing the info and who are they is pretty critical.
rather than rehash all this stuff i think i'll just be posting 'new' evidence or a review from the chicago conference.. if yer nearby and want to check it out, surf over to
www.revealingthetruth.org i'm honestly going to try to play spot the crackpot while i'm there cause i bet there will be at least one presenter among the credible researchers but i really hope he/she gets pointed out by others before me. there will be more in the attendee category of course.