Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mburbank
Kevin, you honestly and asincerely think the motive is to reduce frivilous lawsuits? Outside of being devils advocate and porvocative and all, you think that's the clean clear altruistic motive?
|
No, I think it's a cabal of jewish lobbyists, neo-cons, Enron executives, Fox news anchors, and Texans trying to destroy the bill of rights and install a monarchy.
I think not everything is a scandal coming from the White House.
I don't think there's necessarily anything altruistic about it, I just think less court cases involving disgruntled government employees (who ever heard of those?) are what they want.
Quote:
|
Not to stray too far off topic, but how is it you're certain Murtha had only motives of personal agrandizement, but this measure is all as it's purported to be and has no ulterior motives along the lines of not wanting anything on the record about internal failure in agencies like FEMA, Homeland security, etc, etc, etc? It seems to me you are.... uneven with your benefit of the doubt, like some sort of self hating closet liberal.
|
I don't think Murtha did this for "personal aggrandizement", but like I said, there's a reason Murtha was the one who got up and said it, rather than Dennis Kucinich or nancy pelosi. I absolutely do not believe that Murtha spontaneously decided to go to the House floor and ramble o about a crime that hasn't even produced any charges yet.