[kahljorn]

But it was describing their race as being black(or dark, in the general case of hamites versus kushites), right? I'm not saying it in itself was racist, or therein implying racism, but rather that it does indeed imply that the sons of cush or whomever were a black tribe(which is an accurate description, no? Generally when you're describing a person per ancestory you refer to their characteristics, right?). I didn't mean to imply that the jews themselves were being racist, because I don't really know, all I was doing was responding to a post cowardly posted which you responded to. The part about slavery was more about the european and american civilization who, in part, used it as a religous excuse for slavery. Did the jews ever use the sons of cush for servants?

Quit being so defensive and read what somebody says before you talk. It's really annoying. I never responded to anything you said in specific negatively or gave out any bad information. I just tried to add to the information regarding if jews or palestines have more of a right to their home than the jews.

Another thing, as to who has rights to the land and yada yada. Remember a few millenia ago there was no civilization and nobody had land. They are arguing about invisible lines in land that everybody established as national territory through war and the politics preceeding it.
So shut your trap when you try to recite history to me like it makes a damn difference, especially since it's partially derived from your heritage. I rarily see somebody who makes race as big of an issue as you do, you're very sensitive about it for some reason.

"in some desperate attempt to claim an indegenous right and erase the fact that they are the descendents who threw the Jews off the land after 2000 years"

Aren't they doing the same thing? Who did they throw off the land? Great stance on the issue though, way to cut to the core.