"Again. The modern concept of race and skin color was not a factor for the ancient Israelites. There were Jews with darker skin. That's the problem with the whole table of nations concept. "
These are people who are often classified as half-negro, there's a world of difference but I don't really want to argue this that badly because I don't even really think it's a good point, I was just trying to add information on the topic. You don't need to be a prick over every little thing, I wasn't at all insulting jews or their ancestors. I love jews. I do however enjoy taking in the facts and not listening to your drama over how the Jews never did anyone anything wrong and no single jew has ever made a racist remark and of course you know the ancient israelites didn't too because they were a peace loving race and you were there when it all happened.
I mean technically with the shit you've been saying in this conversation you've been racist on multiple occasions. Check out the dictionary definition.
Doesn't the jewish word, "Kushi" translate to ******? I know I've heard that before. That's why I kept bringing up the term KUSH. KUSH. KUSH. I don't think jews were the only ones who used that as a racial slur either, I think it might've originally been egyptian. Maybe it's a more modern jewish term, though.
Here's an example I found
And I'm glad you know everything about the ancient israelites. I'm willing to bet 60% of the time you're talking out of your asshole because it seems to me you'll say anything if you think people don't know what you're talking about. Also common sense dictates you are talking out of your asshole, because it's physically and mentally impossible for you to know many of the things you claim, unless of course you are lying. Case in point, it's absolutely ridiculous to pretend you can understand the motivations of ancient israelites, their personal opinions and emotional status. Unless you have one-hundred-thousand journals from 4,000 years ago I don't even want to hear it.
And sorry to derail this thread, it wasn't my original intention when I posted four sentences. I wasn't expecting such a negative response, to me it was just cold information.
Back on topic:
How do you know the palestinians aren't Canaan? And don't tell me, "because we killed them all" that's impossible. If anything their genes would've mixed with whatever race they immigrated to.
The one thing I think eliminates them from being a canaan is that canaan was never technically a country, and I think the nation most identified with it was Phoenicia(which is also gone). Most of the various tribes who made up the land of canaan(including ancient israelites) all pretty much had the same culture and language, they even had a religion setup around worshipping baal. I don't think modern palestinians worship baal, or speak whatever the canaan language is. Considering that uniformity in culture is what made them a unified "Canaanical" people despite their ethnical differences, it's pretty ridiculous for a culture that is culturally disimilar to consider themselves canaan.
P.S. I just noticed this but why do the palestinians call themselves HAMas? lol, kind of ironic.