Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Geggy
Oh jeez you should know better that mainstream press only tells you half of the story but never the rest.
|
So why did you bother citing it to support your claims?
Quote:
|
Now you know that parts of the isi agnecy supported and financed al Qaeda and you should also know that its already been established that the isi has worked in operations with help of the cia in the past. Moments before the start of cold war the cia used isi agents as inside players to funnel billions of dollars into islamist extremist groups in afghanistan for them to fight the soviets.
|
And?
Quote:
|
Mamod Ahmed the chief of isi was exposed by the wallstreet newspaper (the name daniel pearl ring the bell?) that he ordered the funneling of 100,000 dollars to the lead hijacker Atta just few days before 9/11. Why was this info not addressed in the commission report? Why has he not been questioned and put on trial but instead was forced to retire as chief of the isi by the president of pakistan? Are they afraid he may reveal too much?
|
You do realize that only one source, INDIAN intelligence, supports the money wiring claim? Ya think India might have a tiny stake in alienating Pakistan from the U.S.?
And how do you know he
hasn't revealed anything? We want Pakistan, and we currently need Pakistan. How many trips has he made to DC since this money thing came out?
btw, his trips to DC served a real purpose, as opposed to the candy land version you like. He met with Porter Goss and Bob Graham to discuss Bin Laden. Why might those two have been intereste in learning about Bin Laden.
Having breakfast with the guy on 9/11 is embarrassing, but certainly doesn't lead to the conspiracy you've cooked up in your brain. Graham himself has publicly said that the role other governments had in 9/11 is startling, but those findings (like all things) will be archived for 20-30 years. However, if these findings demanded immediate action, they would've been acted upon.
All you have is one report, being circulated around and around and around by the same nutbags such as yourself. All of the conclusions that you have reached are based off of pure speculation, nothing more. What's sad is that you aren't even a unique conspiracy theorist. Everything you're saying is the regurgitation of the same old looney sites, like "cooperative research" and "911truth.org".