Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Geggy
You're the one who's stepping all over the place. I'm just here presenting some circumstane evidences and you're failing at making any connections at all and probably never will do so because you have too much faith in the us gubberment.
|
Your circumstane evidences is far too circumstaneal for my liking.
The dots you're connecting aren't dots, they're mostly nonsense cooked up by paranoid freaks and government haters.
Quote:
|
So you think the fact (which is classified btw) presented by whistleblower graham that the ISI was in it all,
|
So which is it? Did "Whistleblower" Graham out the Saudis, or the ISI? This the third time now you've changed positions on this in this thread. Which is it?
Quote:
|
then how do you explain the cheif of ISI being in DC on the morning of 9/11?
|
I've already addressed this. You should calm down and read what people say before going into a frenzy of links and pics.
The ISI story is supported by only ONE intelligence outlet, and it's an actor with a vested interest in isolating pakistan. That doesn't mean it's entirely wrong, or that the ISI is good, it just means that pretty thoughtful people have already examined this "smoking gun" you're all up in arms about, and don't quite get the anxiety attacks over it that you seem to suffer from.