[mburbank]

So, the constitution says we have a right to bear arms, yes?

But I think we as a people already completely accept gun control. It's just a question of where the line is drawn that we have such disagreement about.

The vast majority of the country would agree that I don't have a right to own my own personal Nuclear weapon or vial of weaponized smallpox. A lot of people would say that I shouldn't be able to have my own tank or a howitzer or even a bazooka. It's right around the level of machine guns and assault rifles that things start to get fuzzy.

So unless you want to argue I should be able to get my own Nuke (and I do want one) what's your point?