Quote:
Originally Posted by juttin
I think a gun that is just enough to shoot someone in the legs/arms to stop them from trying to harm/rob you is good enough.
|
Stop watching movies. Thats just not logistically sound. Ask anyone who works with guns. They will tell you that your best bet is three center mass.
Quote:
I know that the amendment called for rifles and muskets and such,
|
No it doesn't. I says the people have a right to bear arms.
Quote:
but I think police level pistols are where the right to bear arms is kept.
|
Police are issued body armor and automatic weapons.
Quote:
Anything that infringes on someone's rights is contradicting the suspect's rights to do so.
|
My owning a .50 caliber Browning M2 has nothing to do with you or your rights. If I decide to spray your living room with it, then its a problem. The same as if I decide to park my car there.
Quote:
So, no. You shouldn't be allowed to have a weapon that can/will kill or maim someone.
|
Thats everything. Do you know how many veins and arteries go through your arms and legs? Do you know what it takes for a bullet to actually rip off a limb?