|
say what now?
|
 |
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Peebody
|
|

Aug 29th, 2006, 08:56 PM
Oops I think I meant that the approach by us govt on the pearl harbor attack was that it failed based on incompetent decisions, yet it gave them an entry into ww2 in which they most desired for. Similiar kind of approach by the us govt had on 9/11 claiming the security failed in preventing the attacks, yet it gave them an opportunity to invade the middle east to further their agenda.
Blanco I still stand by the retarded controlled demolition idea. I'm no structural engineer but it was the anamolies and the coverups surrounding the collapsing of the three buildings that lead me to believe that it came down by controlled demolition. I rarely ever talk about it anymore because it would require observing photographic and video images and I got sick of it. But even if it was true that the buildings came down by plane impacts and building falling next to it (WTC7), how does it not make it an inside job?
|
__________________
enjoy now, regret later
|
|
|